osmose-backend
osmose-backend copied to clipboard
Potential false positive - name-only way that is part of a relation
Osmose Ref 1 - 9001(3)/9001001 20f90fa3-2f9e-6dee-2b84-d4da0701f533 Details link 1- http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issue/20f90fa3-2f9e-6dee-2b84-d4da0701f533
Osmose Ref 2 - 2110(2)/21101 873976ad-8dce-10c0-3cc6-a968806d3688 Details link 2 - http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issue/873976ad-8dce-10c0-3cc6-a968806d3688
Way - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1039608533
This is a way that is part of a school - it's a 'exclave' - a school site. It's tagged with just a name; the amenity=school is on a relation that contains the other school site. I think this is valid tagging and that therefore there are two false positives here.
One address for two locations miles away? I guess that cannot be correct, right?
I don't think that's the cause of the false positive, though I could be mistaken. If you want to write to the school, you write to the one address. Do you think that adding addr: tags to the second site would fix it? Happy to try...
I've added an addr: to the way in Changeset 120203518. This is the same address as the relation. The other site already had its own addr: tags - which might be why no Osmose problem was reported for the other site. So you're probably correct.