osher
osher
@bcoe - I'd really appreciate it if you could take a look, or direct me to who can help Thanks for all the good work! :)
I also see that `client.serverInfo.redis_version` and such have moved to `__redisClient.serverInfo.redis_version` is there a stated accessor to the server info I should use, or is it legit to access `__redicClient`...
@inancgumus - here are the parts I can share. It's edited - I removed any secret sauce that could be IP of my client, and made the flow straight forward......
@sheremet-va - thanks for your reply If I wanted to support any type and give special treatment to Array and function, I would do something like: ```patch export function parseStacktrace(...
First - wow. you're a fast one. I updated my comment above to be clearer... saw you already replied after I finished please check it... Anyway - If we don't...
Would you please consider the case for a moment? You run a test, you get a fail and you don't get a stack trace. No failed assertion, no stack trace,...
> Don't patch built-ins if you want to see the stack trace. It's that simple. That's what the project requirements are... This is not even the project per-se, it's using...
> You can use it, you just won't see the stack trace And not know what the test failed for? Sir, I'm sorry, this is a basic expectation from a...