ord
ord copied to clipboard
ordinals
Two NFTs mint on same sat, but second one can display on ordinal.com, first one didn't. what happened on first NFT?
what happened on first NFT?
there are their NFT Ids:
First NFT: 88d3dfe7d16d6ca3092b13ea1b1db9c2983eeac879a44c163fb0d410fb27b91bi0
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/88d3dfe7d16d6ca3092b13ea1b1db9c2983eeac879a44c163fb0d410fb27b91b
Second NFT: d93f91cc29ce0caaa7e1999207595a64965ed518d441e2732d80430438531acai0
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/d93f91cc29ce0caaa7e1999207595a64965ed518d441e2732d80430438531aca
there are another 5 NFTs not display on ordinals.com, maybe have same reason
4eecaab97bbf18f65b0f3a4ddc18340ceaebd5542031025129fcfa0f05f3af53i0 57659e72b0cda8378fbe7a5792f8d387c7a145cb00ec31d11c609e7b986f040ai0 7d0f0c21ac2f7bbd625ef1753b994a4f6586ff3568f1bb211b5f3c6fe201586di0 838bca81f6a9b3c146c4725ae880d8e1fc20e9981aa5ddba4d74b47c3ac26ee3i0 93d190341575ef31d3539f82cd7ab50a0ee8bda3e8f637d8f7df278819def276i0
What was the inscription number for the first one before the second was made?
What was the inscription number for the first one before the second was made?
First NFT not recognized by ordinals.com, so I dont know what its inscription is. I just develop a program to scan all NFT in history block by monitor NFT mint rule and found this problem. First NFT was recognized by my program, so I am confused about oridinals.com.
one sat can only inscribe one inscription, so the new inscription will override the old one.
one sat can only inscribe one inscription, so the new inscription will override the old one.
Maybe I am wrong here but I do not think there is anything that prevents one satoshi from having 2 inscriptions. Inscriptions are stored on the blockchain and the satoshis are tracked by ordinal theory, so theoretically you could have a single sat with multiple inscriptions. You cannot ever override the inscriptions of an ordinal on bitcoin's blockchain, you can just add more inscriptions and ask the indexer to prefer the latest inscription, both inscriptions still exist.
theoretically you could have a single sat with multiple inscriptions.
In my understanding, I think so too. I guess it's the problem of the indexer.
what happened on first NFT?
there are their NFT Ids:
First NFT: 88d3dfe7d16d6ca3092b13ea1b1db9c2983eeac879a44c163fb0d410fb27b91bi0
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/88d3dfe7d16d6ca3092b13ea1b1db9c2983eeac879a44c163fb0d410fb27b91b
Second NFT: d93f91cc29ce0caaa7e1999207595a64965ed518d441e2732d80430438531acai0
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/d93f91cc29ce0caaa7e1999207595a64965ed518d441e2732d80430438531aca
there are another 5 NFTs not display on ordinals.com, maybe have same reason
4eecaab97bbf18f65b0f3a4ddc18340ceaebd5542031025129fcfa0f05f3af53i0 57659e72b0cda8378fbe7a5792f8d387c7a145cb00ec31d11c609e7b986f040ai0 7d0f0c21ac2f7bbd625ef1753b994a4f6586ff3568f1bb211b5f3c6fe201586di0 838bca81f6a9b3c146c4725ae880d8e1fc20e9981aa5ddba4d74b47c3ac26ee3i0 93d190341575ef31d3539f82cd7ab50a0ee8bda3e8f637d8f7df278819def276i0
I review this issue again. This is not issue about Two NFTs mint on same sat, not this situation. It just oridinals.com's indexer problem. It can't index some early inscriptions.
