Orange Mug

Hey @oterral glad for the help. So there is a reason why this hasn't been worked on in a while (sorry for that). I've been fixing other parts of the...

So I have some thoughts. Basically my motivations here getting the right solution and not wasting anybodies time (with regards to development). Maputnik doesn't currently have a _server_ and I'd...

First off @oterral thank you for looking at this issue. Sorry it's taken me some time to get back to you I've been super busy with the day job. I...

@oterral yeah gatekeeper uses the correct approach. Temp token with the real token returned in the response 👍 > Also geojson.net is using https:// and it is possible to load...

> I understand all your concerns @orangemug but I don't think using maputnik as desktop software is an option for us @oterral if you could drop a comment in #164...

@oterral congrats on getting it working! I'm a bit busy for the next couple of days but will find time to take a proper look at the weekend. Note: Also...

Yeah I agree, on a slightly related note we should probably add a 'code of conduct' to the repo/org also, which would need email address(es). What would be really cool...

@pathmapper so what we're saying here is that before we had 2 types of old-style functions - Zoom - Data We should instead just have 1 type 'data', the type...

@pathmapper so what maputnik has tried to do in the past is treat zoom functions as a special type of function that are different from data functions. Zoom functions were...

@pathmapper I had another look at this given your comments. I think we can split our options into 2 groups, by-property and by-zoom There is a partially _working(ish)_ branch in...