openzfs
EL10.0 repo
Describe the feature would like to see added to OpenZFS
Add AlmaLinux 10.0 builds to http://download.zfsonlinux.org/epel-testing/10.0
How will this feature improve OpenZFS?
Support EL10 based systems with pre-built/tested RPM packages
Additional context
Now that RHEL 10.0 and AlmaLinux 10.0 are GA (with Rocky Linux 10.0 coming soon), it would be nice to have official packages. However, perhaps this needs to wait for zfs-2.3.3?
My workstation /home is on ZFS, and I didn't wanna wait on upgrading to AlmaLinux 10, so I was a bad boy and did dnf install https://zfsonlinux.org/epel/zfs-release-2-3.el9.noarch.rpm on AL10, then edited /etc/yum.repos.d/zfs.repo to enable the testing repo and hardcoded all $releasever references to 9. DNF freaked out about the GPG key, so I cd /etc/pki/rpm-gpg and ln -s RPM-GPG-KEY-openzfs-2022 RPM-GPG-KEY-openzfs-el-10. After reading #17290 I was gonna install zfs 2.1 for now, but EL10's 6.12 kernel needs min zfs 2.2 to be compatible, so I did dnf --showduplicates list zfs and grabbed the most recent 2.2 with dnf install zfs-2.2.7-1.el9 which built and installed and seems to be working fine so far. Hope that helps anyone else who is too impatient.
Release repository for EL10 is already there (since 2.2.8 I suppose), but the packages appear unsigned:
Package libnvpair3-2.2.8-1.el10.x86_64.rpm is not signed
Package libuutil3-2.2.8-1.el10.x86_64.rpm is not signed
Package libzfs5-2.2.8-1.el10.x86_64.rpm is not signed
Package libzpool5-2.2.8-1.el10.x86_64.rpm is not signed
Package zfs-2.2.8-1.el10.x86_64.rpm is not signed
Package zfs-dkms-2.2.8-1.el10.noarch.rpm is not signed
Release repository for EL10 is already there (since 2.2.8 I suppose), but the packages appear unsigned:
Not at the requested URL: http://download.zfsonlinux.org/epel-testing/10.0, though there are many others at the parent location http://download.zfsonlinux.org/epel-testing/
I also don't see any EL10 repo documented at https://openzfs.github.io/openzfs-docs/Getting%20Started/RHEL-based%20distro/index.html
Yeah, I would expect the docs to still fail, cuz there doesn't seem to be a zfs-release package for EL10 at https://zfsonlinux.org/epel/zfs-release-2-3.el10.noarch.rpm yet (HTTP 404). I reverted my zfs.repo back to the defaults from the EL9 zfs-release package, and that was willing to upgrade me to those unsigned EL10 RPM's with dnf update --nogpgcheck. It built and installed and seems to be working fine (I'm logged in on ZFS /home).
Since AlmaLinux 10 provides support for both x86_64-v3 and x86_64-v2 capable hardware (Source), please do you think it would be possible to also provide ZFS builds for both these variants? (Link to corresponding discussion)
Many thanks for the 2.3.3 release that includes 10.0 RPM. However, it appears that they are unsigned,
[root@ldas-pcdev16 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release AlmaLinux release 10.0 (Purple Lion) [root@ldas-pcdev16 ~]# dnf --enablerepo=zfs-testing-kmod install zfs HTCondor for Enterprise Linux 10 - Release 854 kB/s | 17 kB 00:00 AlmaLinux 10 - AppStream 3.1 MB/s | 1.9 MB 00:00 AlmaLinux 10 - BaseOS 3.1 MB/s | 1.7 MB 00:00 AlmaLinux 10 - Extras 33 kB/s | 10 kB 00:00 Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 10 - x86_64 5.6 MB/s | 4.5 MB 00:00 ZFS on Linux for EL10 KMOD 5.0 MB/s | 30 kB 00:00 Dependencies resolved. =========================================================================================================== Package Architecture Version Repository Size =========================================================================================================== Installing: zfs x86_64 2.3.3-1.el10 zfs-testing-kmod 754 k Installing dependencies: kmod-zfs x86_64 2.3.3-1.el10 zfs-testing-kmod 1.7 M libnvpair3 x86_64 2.3.3-1.el10 zfs-testing-kmod 37 k libuutil3 x86_64 2.3.3-1.el10 zfs-testing-kmod 29 k libzfs6 x86_64 2.3.3-1.el10 zfs-testing-kmod 223 k libzpool6 x86_64 2.3.3-1.el10 zfs-testing-kmod 1.3 M Transaction Summary =========================================================================================================== Install 6 Packages Total download size: 4.0 M Installed size: 19 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/6): libnvpair3-2.3.3-1.el10.x86_64.rpm 4.8 MB/s | 37 kB 00:00 (2/6): libuutil3-2.3.3-1.el10.x86_64.rpm 2.9 MB/s | 29 kB 00:00 (3/6): libzfs6-2.3.3-1.el10.x86_64.rpm 36 MB/s | 223 kB 00:00 (4/6): kmod-zfs-2.3.3-1.el10.x86_64.rpm 54 MB/s | 1.7 MB 00:00 (5/6): libzpool6-2.3.3-1.el10.x86_64.rpm 41 MB/s | 1.3 MB 00:00 (6/6): zfs-2.3.3-1.el10.x86_64.rpm 24 MB/s | 754 kB 00:00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 80 MB/s | 4.0 MB 00:00 Package kmod-zfs-2.3.3-1.el10.x86_64.rpm is not signed Package libnvpair3-2.3.3-1.el10.x86_64.rpm is not signed Package libuutil3-2.3.3-1.el10.x86_64.rpm is not signed Package libzfs6-2.3.3-1.el10.x86_64.rpm is not signed Package libzpool6-2.3.3-1.el10.x86_64.rpm is not signed Package zfs-2.3.3-1.el10.x86_64.rpm is not signed The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction. You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. Error: GPG check FAILED
The EL 10.0 repository still isn't quite ready. We need to build a new zfs-release package for it, and as you noticed get those packages signed with the key. For the moment, you're welcome to use the unsigned packages in the testing repository or manually build your own from the tarball.
FYI, I did install the unsigned packages on a test system and I was able to import a small test pool.
Hello! I appreciate that there might not be a good answer to this, but do you have a vague idea as to when the signed 10 repo will become available? I mean, are we talking days, weeks?
How about coupling this to https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/17595
I saw there's unit tests happening for Alma10 in #17595 , so hopefully it's not far away. I do need to do a new install in the coming days, and installing 10 instead of 9 would be useful.
@io7m sorry for the late response - I've been on vacation for awhile but am back in the office now. I'm working on putting together EL10 packages.
Please give it a try now on EL10:
dnf install https://zfsonlinux.org/epel/zfs-release-2-8$(rpm --eval "%{dist}").noarch.rpm
Please give it a try now on EL10:
dnf install https://zfsonlinux.org/epel/zfs-release-2-8$(rpm --eval "%{dist}").noarch.rpm
Another question on the topic of EL10, is ZFS 2.3 coming for EL9/EL10, or is it sticking to ZFS 2.2?
Another question on the topic of EL10, is ZFS 2.3 coming for EL9/EL10, or is it sticking to ZFS 2.2?
zfs 2.2 available from epel (stable) repo.
zfs 2.3 available from epel-testing (unstable) repo.
so, you can use zfs 2.3 on EL10.0 in any time, just by switching from epel to epel-testing repo.
I assume it'll stay in epel-testing for a while, until it's redeemed stable, or is there like a 9 month period of testing?
I don't need any of the current 2.3 features, just wanted to know what the release cycle works.