iD icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
iD copied to clipboard

Line has no descriptive tags

Open SomeoneElseOSM opened this issue 1 year ago • 4 comments

URL

https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id#map=19/53.986065/-1.049651

How to reproduce the issue?

In the real world, something has been removed. It still exists in imagery. Naturally, I want to remove it from OSM, but I also want to leave something on that geometry so that armchair mappers don't "just add it back". An attempt to do this via a note tag results in an "error" (see below). In order to complete the edit I need to add some other nonsensical tags and remove them in another editor.

What should happen instead is that a "note" tag on its own should be valid, rather than having to add some garbage and remove it with another editor. See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1313248451/history

Screenshot(s) or anything else?

Screenshot 2024-09-04 143618

Which deployed environments do you see the issue in?

Released version at openstreetmap.org/edit

What version numbers does this issue effect?

2.30.2

Which browsers are you seeing this problem on?

Firefox

SomeoneElseOSM avatar Sep 04 '24 13:09 SomeoneElseOSM

I think the idea behind this warning is to encourage you to use was:highway=footway or some other lifecycle prefix, right?

The message is just not very helpful....

k-yle avatar Sep 04 '24 21:09 k-yle

Exactly. Every element should have tags, even with disused:, abandoned: or was: prefixes.

maro-21 avatar Sep 06 '24 20:09 maro-21

Really? What would be appropriate for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/637258230#map=15/54.35869/-0.94564 ?

SomeoneElseOSM avatar Sep 06 '24 20:09 SomeoneElseOSM

not:highway=path :] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:not:*

maro-21 avatar Sep 07 '24 15:09 maro-21

I would agree that the use of lifecycle tags (e.g. abandoned:*, razed:*, was:*, not:* etc.) would be preferred for these.

tyrasd avatar Feb 16 '25 11:02 tyrasd