origin MCO-1656: Component Readiness for vSphere Bootimage Update

Status: Manually verified that the new tests for vSphere are passing.

Currently it needs the following PRs to execute correctly:

https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/2301 Needed for the ManagedBootImagesvSphere FeatureGate
https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/4677 ValidationAdmissionPolicy managed-bootimages-platform-check to allow VSphere as the BootImageUpdatePlatform.

To do:

Add another E2E Test Steps:
1. Scales down a MachineSet replicas -= 1
2. Waits for a successful bootimage update
3. Scales up the MachineSet replicas += 1
4. Verifies the new Machine spawned should have been booted from the updated bootimage (possibly by looking at the MCD log aleph version)

Apr 29 '25 22:04 RishabhSaini

@RishabhSaini: This pull request references MCO-1656 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Apr 29 '25 22:04 openshift-ci-robot

@RishabhSaini: This pull request references MCO-1656 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Status: Manually verified that the new tests for vSphere are passing.

Currently it needs:

https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/2301 for the FeatureGate

ValidationAdmissionPolicy managed-bootimages-platform-check to allow VSphere as the BootImageUpdatePlatform

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Apr 30 '25 19:04 openshift-ci-robot

@RishabhSaini: This pull request references MCO-1656 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Status: Manually verified that the new tests for vSphere are passing.

Currently it needs:

https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/2301 for the FeatureGate

ValidationAdmissionPolicy managed-bootimages-platform-check to allow VSphere as the BootImageUpdatePlatform. https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/4677

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Apr 30 '25 19:04 openshift-ci-robot

@RishabhSaini: This pull request references MCO-1656 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Status: Manually verified that the new tests for vSphere are passing.

Currently it needs:

https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/2301 Needed for the ManagedBootImagesvSphere FeatureGate

https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/4677 ValidationAdmissionPolicy managed-bootimages-platform-check to allow VSphere as the BootImageUpdatePlatform.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Apr 30 '25 19:04 openshift-ci-robot

@RishabhSaini: This pull request references MCO-1656 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Status: Manually verified that the new tests for vSphere are passing.

Currently it needs the following PRs to execute correctly:

https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/2301 Needed for the ManagedBootImagesvSphere FeatureGate

https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/4677 ValidationAdmissionPolicy managed-bootimages-platform-check to allow VSphere as the BootImageUpdatePlatform.

To do:

Add another E2E Test Steps:

Scales down a MachineSet replicas -= 1

Waits for a successful bootimage update

Scales up the MachineSet replicas += 1

Verifies the new Machine spawned should have been booted from the updated bootimage

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Apr 30 '25 19:04 openshift-ci-robot

@RishabhSaini: This pull request references MCO-1656 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Status: Manually verified that the new tests for vSphere are passing.

Currently it needs the following PRs to execute correctly:

https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/2301 Needed for the ManagedBootImagesvSphere FeatureGate

https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/4677 ValidationAdmissionPolicy managed-bootimages-platform-check to allow VSphere as the BootImageUpdatePlatform.

To do:

Add another E2E Test Steps:

Scales down a MachineSet replicas -= 1

Waits for a successful bootimage update

Scales up the MachineSet replicas += 1

Verifies the new Machine spawned should have been booted from the updated bootimage (possibly by looking at the MCD log aleph version)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Apr 30 '25 19:04 openshift-ci-robot

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: a5da303a396c71e000402f6f6c123b4686ff5646

Job Name	Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-disruptive	Medium [sig-node] static pods should start after being created Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis --- [bz-Etcd] clusteroperator/etcd should not change condition/Available Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling	Low [sig-architecture] platform pods in ns/openshift-etcd should not exit an excessive amount of times This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:azure SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week. --- [bz-etcd][invariant] alert/etcdMembersDown should not be at or above info This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:azure SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week. --- [bz-kube-storage-version-migrator] clusteroperator/kube-storage-version-migrator should not change condition/Available This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:azure SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week. --- [bz-Cloud Compute] clusteroperator/control-plane-machine-set should not change condition/Degraded This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:azure SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling	Low [bz-Cloud Compute] clusteroperator/control-plane-machine-set should not change condition/Degraded This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:gcp SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling	High [sig-api-machinery] disruption/cache-openshift-api apiserver/openshift-apiserver connection/new should be available throughout the test This test has passed 99.58% of 4761 runs on release 4.20 [Overall] in the last week. --- [sig-instrumentation] disruption/metrics-api connection/new should be available throughout the test This test has passed 99.57% of 3933 runs on release 4.20 [Overall] in the last week.

May 15 '25 05:05 openshift-trt[bot]

@RishabhSaini: This pull request references MCO-1656 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Status: Manually verified that the new tests for vSphere are passing.

Currently it needs the following PRs to execute correctly:

https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/2301 Needed for the ManagedBootImagesvSphere FeatureGate

https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/4677 ValidationAdmissionPolicy managed-bootimages-platform-check to allow VSphere as the BootImageUpdatePlatform.

https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/5187

To do:

Add another E2E Test Steps:

Scales down a MachineSet replicas -= 1

Waits for a successful bootimage update

Scales up the MachineSet replicas += 1

Verifies the new Machine spawned should have been booted from the updated bootimage (possibly by looking at the MCD log aleph version)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Jul 23 '25 16:07 openshift-ci-robot

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 4b9091c1cfd5d6b6d2e2ffa71b16e2a6fac52072

Job Name	Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-microshift	IncompleteTests Tests for this run (23) are below the historical average (1754): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial	IncompleteTests Tests for this run (23) are below the historical average (828): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling	Low [bz-kube-storage-version-migrator] clusteroperator/kube-storage-version-migrator should not change condition/Available This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:azure SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week. Open Bugs etcd-scaling jobs failing ~60% of the time [CI] e2e-openstack-ovn-etcd-scaling job permanent fails at many openshift-test tests --- [bz-Cloud Compute] clusteroperator/control-plane-machine-set should not change condition/Degraded This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:azure SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week. Open Bugs etcd-scaling jobs failing ~60% of the time

Jul 23 '25 22:07 openshift-trt[bot]

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 761339a0709ac3a951c0d00cf8c351b2c219616d

Job Name	Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-disruptive	IncompleteTests Tests for this run (106) are below the historical average (143): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling	Low [bz-kube-storage-version-migrator] clusteroperator/kube-storage-version-migrator should not change condition/Available This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:azure SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week. Open Bugs etcd-scaling jobs failing ~60% of the time [CI] e2e-openstack-ovn-etcd-scaling job permanent fails at many openshift-test tests --- [bz-Cloud Compute] clusteroperator/control-plane-machine-set should not change condition/Degraded This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:azure SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week. Open Bugs etcd-scaling jobs failing ~60% of the time
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-disruptive	IncompleteTests Tests for this run (107) are below the historical average (167): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling	Low [bz-Cloud Compute] clusteroperator/control-plane-machine-set should not change condition/Degraded This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:gcp SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week. Open Bugs etcd-scaling jobs failing ~60% of the time
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial-2of2	High [sig-architecture] platform pods in ns/openshift-cluster-csi-drivers should not exit an excessive amount of times This test has passed 99.60% of 4485 runs on release 4.20 [Overall] in the last week.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi	IncompleteTests Tests for this run (12) are below the historical average (3402): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)

Jul 25 '25 22:07 openshift-trt[bot]

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview-serial

Aug 07 '25 14:08 RishabhSaini

@RishabhSaini: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview-serial

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/7badb410-7398-11f0-9462-146da25a8999-0

Aug 07 '25 14:08 openshift-ci[bot]

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.20-e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview-serial

Aug 07 '25 14:08 RishabhSaini

@RishabhSaini: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.20-e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview-serial

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/a0ca2170-7398-11f0-84fc-f3f24adfe5a9-0

Aug 07 '25 14:08 openshift-ci[bot]

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.20-periodics-e2e-vsphere-mco-disruptive-techpreview

Aug 07 '25 18:08 RishabhSaini

@RishabhSaini: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.20-periodics-e2e-vsphere-mco-disruptive-techpreview

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/6714a450-73bb-11f0-9bdb-70a8740b9f01-0

Aug 07 '25 18:08 openshift-ci[bot]

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 5071a5360de5d4b0c56e54b5d5403a162d454f00

Job Name	Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-disruptive	IncompleteTests Tests for this run (106) are below the historical average (277): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)

Aug 08 '25 04:08 openshift-trt[bot]

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.20-periodics-e2e-vsphere-mco-disruptive-techpreview

Aug 12 '25 17:08 RishabhSaini

@RishabhSaini: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.20-periodics-e2e-vsphere-mco-disruptive-techpreview

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/af2c7180-77a5-11f0-9084-f7d4f7ee9b48-0

Aug 12 '25 17:08 openshift-ci[bot]

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 4828f521cc178bb7ef852b80bbc63533758a9976

Job Name	Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade	IncompleteTests
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial-2of2	IncompleteTests Tests for this run (22) are below the historical average (1496): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)

Risk analysis has seen new tests most likely introduced by this PR. Please ensure that new tests meet guidelines for naming and stability.

New Test Risks for sha: 4828f521cc178bb7ef852b80bbc63533758a9976

Job Name	New Test Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview	Medium - "[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with invalid namespace labels on should fail to create namespace with invalid fsgroup label" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview	Medium - "[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with invalid namespace labels on should fail to create namespace with invalid selinux label" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview	Medium - "[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with valid namespace labels on when fsgroup should default to OnRootMismatch if pod has none" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview	Medium - "[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with valid namespace labels on when fsgroup should not override fsgroup change policy if pod already has one" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview	Medium - "[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with valid namespace labels on when selinux should default to selinux label of namespace if pod has none" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview	Medium - "[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with valid namespace labels on when selinux should not override selinux change policy if pod already has one" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.

New tests seen in this PR at sha: 4828f521cc178bb7ef852b80bbc63533758a9976

"[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with invalid namespace labels on should fail to create namespace with invalid fsgroup label" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]
"[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with invalid namespace labels on should fail to create namespace with invalid selinux label" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]
"[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with valid namespace labels on when fsgroup should default to OnRootMismatch if pod has none" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]
"[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with valid namespace labels on when fsgroup should not override fsgroup change policy if pod already has one" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]
"[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with valid namespace labels on when selinux should default to selinux label of namespace if pod has none" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]
"[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with valid namespace labels on when selinux should not override selinux change policy if pod already has one" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]

Aug 12 '25 22:08 openshift-trt[bot]

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.20-periodics-e2e-vsphere-mco-disruptive-techpreview

Aug 12 '25 23:08 RishabhSaini

@RishabhSaini: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.20-periodics-e2e-vsphere-mco-disruptive-techpreview

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/449570c0-77d1-11f0-8db7-baae8b9a941a-0

Aug 12 '25 23:08 openshift-ci[bot]

Risk analysis has seen new tests most likely introduced by this PR. Please ensure that new tests meet guidelines for naming and stability.

New Test Risks for sha: bcd8c5edd6d1cc55c19393ae67e1c92e92ccd923

Job Name	New Test Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview	Medium - "[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with invalid namespace labels on should fail to create namespace with invalid fsgroup label" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview	Medium - "[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with invalid namespace labels on should fail to create namespace with invalid selinux label" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview	Medium - "[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with valid namespace labels on when fsgroup should default to OnRootMismatch if pod has none" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview	Medium - "[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with valid namespace labels on when fsgroup should not override fsgroup change policy if pod already has one" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview	Medium - "[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with valid namespace labels on when selinux should default to selinux label of namespace if pod has none" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview	Medium - "[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with valid namespace labels on when selinux should not override selinux change policy if pod already has one" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.

New tests seen in this PR at sha: bcd8c5edd6d1cc55c19393ae67e1c92e92ccd923

"[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with invalid namespace labels on should fail to create namespace with invalid fsgroup label" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]
"[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with invalid namespace labels on should fail to create namespace with invalid selinux label" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]
"[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with valid namespace labels on when fsgroup should default to OnRootMismatch if pod has none" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]
"[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with valid namespace labels on when fsgroup should not override fsgroup change policy if pod already has one" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]
"[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with valid namespace labels on when selinux should default to selinux label of namespace if pod has none" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]
"[sig-storage][OCPFeatureGate:StoragePerformantSecurityPolicy] Storage Performant Policy with valid namespace labels on when selinux should not override selinux change policy if pod already has one" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]

Aug 13 '25 04:08 openshift-trt[bot]

@RishabhSaini: This pull request references MCO-1656 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Status: Manually verified that the new tests for vSphere are passing.

Currently it needs the following PRs to execute correctly:

https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/2301 Needed for the ManagedBootImagesvSphere FeatureGate

https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/4677 ValidationAdmissionPolicy managed-bootimages-platform-check to allow VSphere as the BootImageUpdatePlatform.

https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/5187

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Aug 13 '25 14:08 openshift-ci-robot

@RishabhSaini: This pull request references MCO-1656 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Status: Verified that the new tests for vSphere are passing.

Currently it needs the following PRs to execute correctly:

https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/2301 Needed for the ManagedBootImagesvSphere FeatureGate

https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/4677 ValidationAdmissionPolicy managed-bootimages-platform-check to allow VSphere as the BootImageUpdatePlatform.

https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/5187

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Aug 13 '25 14:08 openshift-ci-robot

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.20-periodics-e2e-vsphere-mco-disruptive-techpreview

Aug 13 '25 16:08 RishabhSaini

@RishabhSaini: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.20-periodics-e2e-vsphere-mco-disruptive-techpreview

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/f332d860-785e-11f0-946e-451eb5f77af7-0

Aug 13 '25 16:08 openshift-ci[bot]

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 8a03bd83c2def90cab8d5b60bb02fe0da8509e06

Job Name	Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway	IncompleteTests Tests for this run (103) are below the historical average (2683): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)

Aug 13 '25 20:08 openshift-trt[bot]

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.20-periodics-e2e-vsphere-mco-disruptive-techpreview

Aug 13 '25 22:08 RishabhSaini

@RishabhSaini: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.20-periodics-e2e-vsphere-mco-disruptive-techpreview

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/e785ba50-7890-11f0-9a65-ffc7237d6591-0

Aug 13 '25 22:08 openshift-ci[bot]