origin icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
origin copied to clipboard

Bug 1933144: Bump k8s to include c83b5d076f5

Open pacevedom opened this issue 3 years ago • 33 comments

Includes https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/1307

pacevedom avatar Aug 29 '22 09:08 pacevedom

/hold

pacevedom avatar Aug 29 '22 09:08 pacevedom

@pacevedom: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1933144, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.12.0" release, but it targets "4.10.0" instead
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1933144: Bump k8s to include c83b5d076f5

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci[bot] avatar Aug 29 '22 09:08 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

pacevedom avatar Aug 29 '22 09:08 pacevedom

@pacevedom: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1933144, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci[bot] avatar Aug 29 '22 09:08 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

pacevedom avatar Aug 29 '22 09:08 pacevedom

@pacevedom: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1933144, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.12.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.12.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact: /cc @wangke19

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci[bot] avatar Aug 29 '22 09:08 openshift-ci[bot]

/unhold

pacevedom avatar Aug 29 '22 09:08 pacevedom

/retest-required

pacevedom avatar Sep 02 '22 08:09 pacevedom

/retest-required

pacevedom avatar Sep 05 '22 07:09 pacevedom

/retest-required

pacevedom avatar Sep 13 '22 05:09 pacevedom

/assign @stbenjam /cc @soltysh

eggfoobar avatar Sep 13 '22 13:09 eggfoobar

/lgtm /override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-builds Overriding builds because of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-1237

stbenjam avatar Sep 13 '22 14:09 stbenjam

@stbenjam: Overrode contexts on behalf of stbenjam: ci/prow/e2e-gcp-builds

In response to this:

/lgtm /override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-builds Overriding builds because of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-1237

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci[bot] avatar Sep 13 '22 14:09 openshift-ci[bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pacevedom, stbenjam

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-ci[bot] avatar Sep 13 '22 14:09 openshift-ci[bot]

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 60bb3c1f67d7ce9e787c79bd2fc2c38b348d0cc1 and 2 for PR HEAD b394d69e1bfe979fd65590cefd22eb5f274c0b99 in total

openshift-ci-robot avatar Sep 13 '22 15:09 openshift-ci-robot

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 6e193a5a4e58017376c25e2633d3902d860af188 and 1 for PR HEAD b394d69e1bfe979fd65590cefd22eb5f274c0b99 in total

openshift-ci-robot avatar Sep 13 '22 19:09 openshift-ci-robot

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD c073aa967e525b358b44803e25f1cf280fbc69ff and 0 for PR HEAD b394d69e1bfe979fd65590cefd22eb5f274c0b99 in total

openshift-ci-robot avatar Sep 13 '22 23:09 openshift-ci-robot

/hold

Revision b394d69e1bfe979fd65590cefd22eb5f274c0b99 was retested 3 times: holding

openshift-ci-robot avatar Sep 14 '22 03:09 openshift-ci-robot

@stbenjam It seems the ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial has a high failure rate, not sure if you think it's worth skipping for this

eggfoobar avatar Sep 14 '22 15:09 eggfoobar

/retest-required

eggfoobar avatar Sep 15 '22 15:09 eggfoobar

/retest-required

pacevedom avatar Sep 20 '22 06:09 pacevedom

/retest-required

pacevedom avatar Sep 20 '22 09:09 pacevedom

/retest-required

pacevedom avatar Sep 20 '22 13:09 pacevedom

/unhold

Un-holding since recent tests passed

eggfoobar avatar Sep 20 '22 19:09 eggfoobar

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 199ad942ed2d5998b83da2a609e0a11e70e5475a and 2 for PR HEAD b394d69e1bfe979fd65590cefd22eb5f274c0b99 in total

openshift-ci-robot avatar Sep 20 '22 23:09 openshift-ci-robot

/retest-required

eggfoobar avatar Sep 21 '22 00:09 eggfoobar

/retest-required

eggfoobar avatar Sep 21 '22 04:09 eggfoobar

/retest-required

pacevedom avatar Sep 21 '22 07:09 pacevedom

/retest-required

pacevedom avatar Sep 21 '22 10:09 pacevedom

/retest-required

pacevedom avatar Sep 21 '22 14:09 pacevedom