openshift-docs icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
openshift-docs copied to clipboard

Update list of all supported wapiVersions in External DNS Operator Documentation

Open ankhande opened this issue 1 year ago • 16 comments

Update list of all supported wapiVersions in external dns operator documentations

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-12220

Version(s):

4.16+

Issue:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-12220

Link to docs preview:

https://83270--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/networking/external_dns_operator/nw-creating-dns-records-on-infoblox.html

QE review:

  • [ ] QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Currently in External DNS operator documentation, the wapiVersion present is "2.3.1" which is quite old as there are multiple new versions updated after that.

  • Here are the list of currently supported wapiVersions: 2.3.1, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.6.1, 2.7, 2.7.1, 2.7.2, 2.7.3, 2.8, 2.9, 2.9.1.
  • Unless explicitly stated in the release notes, previously available WAPI versions are intended to remain accessible and operative with later versions.

Also, we raised a test PR[1] with the latest wapiVersion "2.9.1" as the default version for tests, and it passed all the e2e tests. So, "2.9.1" seems to be working fine with our Infoblox instance.

So, we need to update the list of all supported wapiVersions in our product documentation[2] to avoid the confusion : [1] openshift/external-dns-operator#229 [2] https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.16/networking/external_dns_operator/nw-creating-dns-records-on-infoblox.html

ankhande avatar Oct 09 '24 16:10 ankhande

/label peer-review-in-progress

ankhande avatar Oct 09 '24 16:10 ankhande

@ankhande: Can not set label peer-review-in-progress: Must be member in one of these teams: [team-red-hat]

In response to this:

/label peer-review-in-progress

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

openshift-ci[bot] avatar Oct 09 '24 16:10 openshift-ci[bot]

Hi @ankhande. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

openshift-ci[bot] avatar Oct 09 '24 16:10 openshift-ci[bot]

/label peer-review-in-progress

PoornimaSingour avatar Oct 09 '24 16:10 PoornimaSingour

/ok-to-test

libander avatar Oct 16 '24 08:10 libander

🤖 Fri Oct 25 02:02:23 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://83270--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/networking/external_dns_operator/nw-creating-dns-records-on-infoblox.html

ocpdocs-previewbot avatar Oct 16 '24 08:10 ocpdocs-previewbot

@melvinjoseph86 PTAL, thanks

lihongan avatar Oct 22 '24 05:10 lihongan

/label qe-approved

melvinjoseph86 avatar Oct 23 '24 11:10 melvinjoseph86

/label merge-review-needed

ankhande avatar Oct 24 '24 00:10 ankhande

@ankhande: Can not set label merge-review-needed: Must be member in one of these teams: [team-red-hat]

In response to this:

/label merge-review-needed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

openshift-ci[bot] avatar Oct 24 '24 00:10 openshift-ci[bot]

/label merge-review-needed for @ankhande

lihongan avatar Oct 24 '24 02:10 lihongan

Hi, this did not have a peer review by the OpenShift docs team. It needs one before it can be merged. I will do that peer review.

kcarmichael08 avatar Oct 24 '24 15:10 kcarmichael08

@ankhande: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

openshift-ci[bot] avatar Oct 25 '24 02:10 openshift-ci[bot]

/label merge-review-needed

ankhande avatar Oct 25 '24 02:10 ankhande

/label merge-review-in-progress

agantony avatar Oct 25 '24 09:10 agantony

You need to squash the commits before we can merge this PR.

/remove-label merge-review-needed /remove-label merge-review-in-progress

agantony avatar Oct 25 '24 09:10 agantony

The branch/enterprise-4.19 label has been added to this PR.

This is because your PR targets the main branch and is labeled for enterprise-4.18. And any PR going into main must also target the latest version branch (enterprise-4.19).

If the update in your PR does NOT apply to version 4.19 onward, please re-target this PR to go directly into the appropriate version branch or branches (enterprise-4.x) instead of main.

bergerhoffer avatar Feb 24 '25 19:02 bergerhoffer

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale. Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close. Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

openshift-bot avatar May 26 '25 09:05 openshift-bot

The branch/enterprise-4.20 label has been added to this PR.

This is because your PR targets the main branch and is labeled for enterprise-4.19. And any PR going into main must also target the latest version branch (enterprise-4.20).

If the update in your PR does NOT apply to version 4.20 onward, please re-target this PR to go directly into the appropriate version branch or branches (enterprise-4.x) instead of main.

bergerhoffer avatar Jun 16 '25 18:06 bergerhoffer

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten. Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity. Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten /remove-lifecycle stale

openshift-bot avatar Jul 17 '25 00:07 openshift-bot

/remove-lifecycle stale

alebedev87 avatar Jul 18 '25 08:07 alebedev87

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten. Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

openshift-bot avatar Aug 18 '25 00:08 openshift-bot

@openshift-bot: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten. Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

openshift-ci[bot] avatar Aug 18 '25 00:08 openshift-ci[bot]