RN Telco RAN 4.16 Fixed issue OCPBUGS-33471

[slovern]

trafficstars

TELCODOCS-1737 - RN Telco RAN 4.16 Fixed issue OCPBUGS-33471

Version(s): 4.16

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/TELCODOCS-1737 Telco RAN Fixed Issues

Bug: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-33471 Link to docs preview: https://78495--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-16-release-notes.html#ocp-4-16-bug-fixes_release-notes ->Edge Computing

QE review:

• [x] QE has approved this change.

Additional information: NOTE: this bug should have been included in 4.16 release but was omitted. Consensus seems to be that we won't need change management in this case - see discussion here.

[ocpdocs-previewbot]

🤖 Thu Jul 04 14:18:27 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://78495--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-16-release-notes.html

[openshift-ci[bot]]

@slovern: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[mcornea]

/lgtm

[slovern]

/label peer-review-needed

[slovern]

/label peer-review-needed

[dfitzmau]

/remove-label peer-review-needed

/label peer-review-in-progress

[slovern]

/label merge-review-needed

[cbippley]

LGTM! Should get announce-only CM.

[opayne1]

I am going to take this off merge review because I think at the very least it should have a DPM ack on it stating it is okay for a CM exception.

[dfitzmau]

Hi @opayne1 and @cbippley . Please see this Slack thread for why a CM was not needed.

[opayne1]

Hi @dfitzmau and @slovern I saw the thread, but since some time has passed since permission was given to not do CM, I would still feel more comfortable having a DPM ack on this before merging. Thanks! cc @kalexand-rh

[kalexand-rh]

LGTM

[slovern]

Thanks for merging @opayne1