openshift-docs
openshift-docs copied to clipboard
openshift
ROX-23494: Add responsibility matrix for ACS
Version(s):
RHACS 4.4+
QE review:
- [ ] QE has approved this change.
Additional information:
Modeled on the ROSA matrix, should we have more rows/columns, and if so, what should be in here?
@kcarmichael08: This pull request references ROX-23494 which is a valid jira issue.
In response to this:
Version(s):
RHACS 4.4+
Link to docs preview:
QE review:
- [ ] QE has approved this change.
Additional information:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.
🤖 Tue Jul 16 20:54:37 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://77107--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-acs/latest/cloud_service/acs-cloud-responsibility-matrix.html
@kcarmichael08: This pull request references ROX-23494 which is a valid jira issue.
In response to this:
Version(s):
RHACS 4.4+
QE review:
- [ ] QE has approved this change.
Additional information:
Modeled on the ROSA matrix, should we have more rows/columns, and if so, what should be in here?
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.
Not exactly sure what "Control plane" refers to.
I have rewritten to try to clarify. I think this was leftover language from ROSA that's not really applicable here.
@kcarmichael08: This pull request references ROX-23494 which is a valid jira issue.
In response to this:
Version(s):
RHACS 4.4+
QE review: (ACS has no QE, reviewed/ack'd by SME)
- [ ] QE has approved this change.
Additional information:
Modeled on the ROSA matrix, should we have more rows/columns, and if so, what should be in here?
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.
@kcarmichael08: This pull request references ROX-23494 which is a valid jira issue.
In response to this:
Version(s):
RHACS 4.4+
QE review: (ACS has no QE, reviewed/ack'd by SME)
- [x] QE has approved this change.
Additional information:
Modeled on the ROSA matrix, should we have more rows/columns, and if so, what should be in here?
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.
@kcarmichael08: all tests passed!
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.
![openshift-ci[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/91280?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
@kcarmichael08: new pull request created: #78966
In response to this:
/cherrypick rhacs-docs-4.4
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.
@kcarmichael08: new pull request created: #78967
In response to this:
/cherrypick rhacs-docs-4.5
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.