OSDOCS-10443: Tech preview RN for oc adm upgrade status

[obrown1205]

Version(s): 4.16

Issue: OSDOCS-10443

Link to docs preview: https://75679--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-16-release-notes.html#ocp-4-16-oc-adm-upgrade-status-tp

QE review:

• [ ] QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

[openshift-ci-robot]

@obrown1205: This pull request references OSDOCS-10443 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.16

Issue:

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

• [ ] QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[ocpdocs-previewbot]

🤖 Thu May 16 17:19:09 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://75679--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-16-release-notes.html

[openshift-ci-robot]

@obrown1205: This pull request references OSDOCS-10443 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.16

Issue: OSDOCS-10443

Link to docs preview: https://75679--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-16-release-notes.html#ocp-4-16-oc-adm-upgrade-status-tp

QE review:

• [ ] QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@obrown1205: This pull request references OSDOCS-10443 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.16

Issue: OSDOCS-10443

Link to docs preview: https://75679--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-16-release-notes.html#ocp-4-16-oc-adm-upgrade-status-tp

QE review: N/A

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[obrown1205]

/label peer-review-needed

[petr-muller]

/cc

[obrown1205]

/label merge-review-needed

[skopacz1]

I think release notes still need to be QE reviewed

[obrown1205]

/remove-label merge-review-needed

[openshift-ci-robot]

@obrown1205: This pull request references OSDOCS-10443 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.16

Issue: OSDOCS-10443

Link to docs preview: https://75679--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-16-release-notes.html#ocp-4-16-oc-adm-upgrade-status-tp

QE review:

• [ ] QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[JianLi-RH]

/lgtm

[evakhoni]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci[bot]]

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@obrown1205: This pull request references OSDOCS-10443 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.16

Issue: OSDOCS-10443

Link to docs preview: https://75679--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-16-release-notes.html#ocp-4-16-oc-adm-upgrade-status-tp

QE review:

• [x] QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[obrown1205]

/label merge-review-needed

[ShaunaDiaz]

@obrown1205 I know this is a merge review, but this release note still doesn't look right. We don't usually talk to our customers in third person, etc. Please consider changes and put back in queue? TY!

[ShaunaDiaz]

/remove-label merge-review-needed

[obrown1205]

@obrown1205 I know this is a merge review, but this release note still doesn't look right. We don't usually talk to our customers in third person, etc. Please consider changes and put back in queue? TY!

Can do! Thank you!

[obrown1205]

/label merge-review-needed

[openshift-ci[bot]]

@obrown1205: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[obrown1205]

/label merge-review-needed

[ShaunaDiaz]

/remove-label merge-review-needed