openshift-docs
openshift-docs copied to clipboard
openshift
OSDOCS-10106: adds 4.14.23 release note MicroShift
Version(s): 4.14
Issue: OSDOCS-10106
Link to docs preview: 4.14.23 release note MicroShift
QE review:
- N/A standard advisory text
@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-10106 which is a valid jira issue.
In response to this:
Version(s): 4.14
Issue: OSDOCS-10106
Link to docs preview:
QE review:
- [ ] QE has approved this change.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.
@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-10106 which is a valid jira issue.
In response to this:
Version(s): 4.14
Issue: OSDOCS-10106
Link to docs preview:
QE review:
- N/A standard advisory text
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.
🤖 Mon May 13 14:26:22 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://75247--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_release_notes/microshift-4-14-release-notes.html
@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-10106 which is a valid jira issue.
In response to this:
Version(s): 4.14
Issue: OSDOCS-10106
Link to docs preview: 4.14.23 release note MicroShift
QE review:
- N/A standard advisory text
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.
@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-10106 which is a valid jira issue.
In response to this:
Version(s): 4.14
Issue: OSDOCS-10106
Link to docs preview: 4.14.23 release note MicroShift
QE review:
- N/A standard advisory text
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.
@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-10106 which is a valid jira issue.
In response to this:
Version(s): 4.14
Issue: OSDOCS-10106
Link to docs preview: 4.14.25 release note MicroShift
QE review:
- N/A standard advisory text
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.
@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-10106 which is a valid jira issue.
In response to this:
Version(s): 4.14
Issue: OSDOCS-10280
Link to docs preview: 4.14.25 release note MicroShift
QE review:
- N/A standard advisory text
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.
@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-10106 which is a valid jira issue.
In response to this:
Version(s): 4.14
Issue: OSDOCS-10280
Link to docs preview: 4.14.25 release note MicroShift
QE review:
- N/A standard advisory text
Additional info: Reuses 4.14.23 canceled release PR
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.
![openshift-ci[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/91280?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
@ShaunaDiaz: all tests passed!
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.
@rh-tokeefe: Those labels are not set on the issue: peer-review-in-progress
In response to this:
/remove-label peer-review-in-progress
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.
Hi @ShaunaDiaz and @rh-tokeefe - just making sure this is supposed to be in "merge review needed" status. I don't want to merge something that's not "live" yet and the date mentioned in the text is 5/15. I wasn't sure if Tim mistakenly added the merge review needed label so I wanted to check.
I'm going to label it "merge-review-in-progress" until I hear back, so that no one picks it up to merge before clarification. I'm about to leave for the day so I will check back tomorrow morning for the resolution.
Hi @rh-tokeefe and @kcarmichael08 No, this is not supposed to be in merge review. If you read the opening commit message, you can see that I reused the 4.14.23 PR for this release note (4.14.25). It needed a peer review only. I have merge rights and will merge it when the release is out. TY!