WIP: RHDEVDOCS-5960 - JIRA link updates for GitOps releases 1.9.4, 1.10.2, and 1.11.1

[Dhruv-Soni11]

Version(s):

Must be CP'ed to GitOps 1.11, 1.10, and 1.9 releases

Issue:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHDEVDOCS-5960

Link to docs preview:

https://73216--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-gitops/latest/release_notes/gitops-release-notes

SME review: @reginapizza QE review: @varshab1210 Peer review: @Srivaralakshmi

QE review:

• [ ] QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

[ocpdocs-previewbot]

🤖 Updated build preview is available at: https://73216--docspreview.netlify.app

Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/37984

[reginapizza]

LGTM but does since this has been changed to RHSA, does it need the type of heading in the doc that says the errata number? (like here in 1.10.1?)

[Dhruv-Soni11]

LGTM but does since this has been changed to RHSA, does it need the type of heading in the doc that says the errata number? (like here in 1.10.1?)

Yeah, I think once we get those details - we can add it here. WDYT @Srivaralakshmi?

[Srivaralakshmi]

LGTM but does since this has been changed to RHSA, does it need the type of heading in the doc that says the errata number? (like here in 1.10.1?)

Yeah, I think once we get those details - we can add it here. WDYT @Srivaralakshmi?

• 1.9.4 - RHSA-2024:0691-02
• 1.10.2 - RHSA-2024:0692-02
• 1.11.1 - RHSA-2024:0689-07

[Dhruv-Soni11]

@Dhruv-Soni11 Good work! Please add the errata updates section as discussed. Please keep the XX and NN parts in the links. Otherwise, the link will throw errors and PR builds won't pass.

The rest of the content LGTM. Thank you!

Hi @Srivaralakshmi - I have added the content for the Errata updates. Please check.

[reginapizza]

hey @Dhruv-Soni11, just checked on this jira and in the comments you'll see I was able to confirm that the errata advisory numbers would stay the same as the previous release, so you should be able to use the same ones :)

[reginapizza]

@Srivaralakshmi can you explain where the -02 and -07 are coming from after the XXXX:nnnn? In our release notes previously it only shows the numbers as XXXX:nnnn without any numbers afterwards

[Srivaralakshmi]

@Srivaralakshmi can you explain where the -02 and -07 are coming from after the XXXX:nnnn? In our release notes previously it only shows the numbers as XXXX:nnnn without any numbers afterwards

@reginapizza Of course. If you see in the errata titles, it is mentioned as is with -02 and -07. Thank you!

[reginapizza]

@Srivaralakshmi the errata titles where though? Everywhere I'm looking (like here for example) none of the errata titles have a format like that, and I don't see anywhere in our release notes for security advisories with anything like that.

[Srivaralakshmi]

@Srivaralakshmi the errata titles where though? Everywhere I'm looking (like here for example) none of the errata titles have a format like that, and I don't see anywhere in our release notes for security advisories with anything like that.

@reginapizza I am not sure whether it is okay to share the errata screenshot in GH. I have shared it in the slack. PTAL. TY!

[Dhruv-Soni11]

@reginapizza and @varshab1210 - Fixed the changes as per your inputs. PTAL and provide an LGTM if everything is ok.

[varshab1210]

LGTM

[reginapizza]

LGTM!

[mramendi]

Unfortunately, this does not work as a cp to GitOps 1.9 and 1.10. I will create the additional PRs myself.

[openshift-merge-robot]

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[Dhruv-Soni11]

Closing this PR as content has already been merged by @mramendi in the following PR as I was away on PTO.