console
console copied to clipboard
OCPBUGS-33487: Fix tsconfig so that VSCode can autocomplete imports correctly
This is a nit that has bothered me for a while. Hopefully it improves the developer experience in our repo.
@TheRealJon: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33487, which is invalid:
- expected the bug to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set
Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.
The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.
In response to this:
This is a nit that has bothered me for a while. Hopefully it improves the developer experience in our repo.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.
/jira refresh
@TheRealJon: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33487, which is invalid:
- expected the bug to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set
Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.
In response to this:
/jira refresh
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.
/jira refresh
@TheRealJon: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33487, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.
3 validation(s) were run on this bug
- bug is open, matching expected state (open)
- bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0)
- bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
Requesting review from QA contact: /cc @yapei
In response to this:
/jira refresh
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.
Huzzah!
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: rhamilto, TheRealJon
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
The pull request process is described here
- ~~frontend/OWNERS~~ [TheRealJon,rhamilto]
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment
/retest-required
Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD f8b1dd442743607825840e20075edf72695624c4 and 2 for PR HEAD 2133b1abd76b21346a3c27bad6f1c68467f4eb20 in total
/retest-required
Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 305254ecd8f00e9ab8b7ebff5d62a572b99051ae and 1 for PR HEAD 2133b1abd76b21346a3c27bad6f1c68467f4eb20 in total
/retest-required
Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD ae115a9e8c72f930a67ee0c545d36f883cd6be34 and 0 for PR HEAD 2133b1abd76b21346a3c27bad6f1c68467f4eb20 in total
@TheRealJon: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:
| Test name | Commit | Details | Required | Rerun command |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ci/prow/frontend | 2133b1abd76b21346a3c27bad6f1c68467f4eb20 | link | true | /test frontend |
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.
/hold
Revision 2133b1abd76b21346a3c27bad6f1c68467f4eb20 was retested 3 times: holding
Looks like the change is is surfacing quite a lot of es-lint errors
/jira refresh
The requirements for Jira bugs have changed (Jira issues linked to PRs on main branch need to target different OCP), recalculating validity.
@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33487, which is valid.
3 validation(s) were run on this bug
- bug is open, matching expected state (open)
- bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0)
- bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
Requesting review from QA contact: /cc @yapei
In response to this:
/jira refresh
The requirements for Jira bugs have changed (Jira issues linked to PRs on main branch need to target different OCP), recalculating validity.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.
/jira refresh
The requirements for Jira bugs have changed (Jira issues linked to PRs on main branch need to target different OCP), recalculating validity.
@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33487, which is invalid:
- expected the bug to target either version "4.17." or "openshift-4.17.", but it targets "4.16.0" instead
Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.
In response to this:
/jira refresh
The requirements for Jira bugs have changed (Jira issues linked to PRs on main branch need to target different OCP), recalculating validity.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.
/hold
Looking into alternative fixes as this may introduce unneccessary complexity to our build.
I'm closing this as it introduces webpack issues that would need to be addressed separately. This change surfaces many import cycle issues that are currently ignored.
@TheRealJon: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33487. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. All external bug links have been closed. The bug has been moved to the NEW state.
In response to this:
This is a nit that has bothered me for a while. Hopefully it improves the developer experience in our repo.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.