console icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
console copied to clipboard

[release-4.8] Bug 2077100: Fix Web Terminal availability check to verify operator is installed

Open openshift-cherrypick-robot opened this issue 3 years ago • 33 comments

This is an automated cherry-pick of #11202

/assign amisevsk

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Bugzilla bug 2065804 has been cloned as Bugzilla bug 2077100. Retitling PR to link against new bug. /retitle [release-4.8] Bug 2077100: Fix Web Terminal availability check to verify operator is installed

In response to this:

[release-4.8] Bug 2065804: Fix Web Terminal availability check to verify operator is installed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci[bot] avatar Apr 20 '22 17:04 openshift-ci[bot]

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2077100, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2065804 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2065804 to target a release in 4.9.0, 4.9.z, but it targets "4.11.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

[release-4.8] Bug 2077100: Fix Web Terminal availability check to verify operator is installed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci[bot] avatar Apr 20 '22 17:04 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

debsmita1 avatar Jun 17 '22 10:06 debsmita1

@debsmita1: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2077100, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2077141 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2077142 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2065804 to target a release in 4.9.0, 4.9.z, but it targets "4.11.0" instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2077142 to target a release in 4.9.0, 4.9.z, but it targets "4.10.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci[bot] avatar Jun 17 '22 10:06 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

invincibleJai avatar Aug 25 '22 06:08 invincibleJai

@invincibleJai: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2077100, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2077141 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2065804 to target a release in 4.9.0, 4.9.z, but it targets "4.11.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci[bot] avatar Aug 25 '22 06:08 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

invincibleJai avatar Aug 25 '22 06:08 invincibleJai

@invincibleJai: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2077100, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2077141 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci[bot] avatar Aug 25 '22 06:08 openshift-ci[bot]

/retest

invincibleJai avatar Sep 07 '22 15:09 invincibleJai

/lgtm /label backport-risk-assessed

have verified the changes and works as expected

wto-4 8

invincibleJai avatar Sep 08 '22 08:09 invincibleJai

/lgtm /label backport-risk-assessed

invincibleJai avatar Sep 08 '22 09:09 invincibleJai

/cc @hemantsaini-7

invincibleJai avatar Sep 08 '22 15:09 invincibleJai

/label cherry-pick-approved

hemantsaini-7 avatar Sep 08 '22 17:09 hemantsaini-7

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-bot avatar Sep 09 '22 01:09 openshift-bot

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2077100, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2077141 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci[bot] avatar Sep 09 '22 01:09 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

invincibleJai avatar Sep 09 '22 05:09 invincibleJai

@invincibleJai: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2077100, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2077141 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci[bot] avatar Sep 09 '22 05:09 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-bot avatar Sep 10 '22 01:09 openshift-bot

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2077100, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2077141 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci[bot] avatar Sep 10 '22 01:09 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-bot avatar Sep 11 '22 01:09 openshift-bot

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2077100, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2077141 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci[bot] avatar Sep 11 '22 01:09 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-bot avatar Sep 12 '22 01:09 openshift-bot

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2077100, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2077141 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci[bot] avatar Sep 12 '22 01:09 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-bot avatar Sep 13 '22 01:09 openshift-bot

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2077100, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2077141 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci[bot] avatar Sep 13 '22 01:09 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

invincibleJai avatar Sep 13 '22 16:09 invincibleJai

@invincibleJai: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2077100, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.8.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.8.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 2077141 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 2077141 targets the "4.9.z" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.9.0, 4.9.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact: /cc @sanketpathak

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci[bot] avatar Sep 13 '22 16:09 openshift-ci[bot]

/assign @jhadvig

invincibleJai avatar Sep 13 '22 16:09 invincibleJai

@spadgett need your approval on this, @jhadvig already approved but label didn't got added

invincibleJai avatar Oct 12 '22 06:10 invincibleJai

/refresh

spadgett avatar Oct 17 '22 16:10 spadgett