console [release-4.8] Bug 2022346: Fix clusterNetwork only selection issue with OCS

This is an automated cherry-pick of #9703

/assign bipuladh

Sep 21 '21 08:09 openshift-cherrypick-robot

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: An error was encountered cloning bug for cherrypick for bug 1989440 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message.


code 53: Bugzilla_api_key is not a valid parameter for the Bugzilla::Bug::create function.

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sep 21 '21 08:09 openshift-ci[bot]

/lgtm

Sep 21 '21 10:09 cloudbehl

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cloudbehl, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~frontend/packages/ceph-storage-plugin/OWNERS~~ [cloudbehl]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sep 21 '21 10:09 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Oct 15 '21 20:10 sdodson

@sdodson: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1989440, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.8.z" release, but it targets "4.9.0" instead
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is VERIFIED instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1989440 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.9.0, 4.9.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Oct 15 '21 20:10 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Oct 16 '21 01:10 openshift-bot

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1989440, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.8.z" release, but it targets "4.9.0" instead
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is VERIFIED instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1989440 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.9.0, 4.9.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Oct 16 '21 01:10 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Oct 17 '21 01:10 openshift-bot

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1989440, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.8.z" release, but it targets "4.9.0" instead
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is VERIFIED instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1989440 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.9.0, 4.9.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Oct 17 '21 01:10 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Oct 18 '21 01:10 openshift-bot

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1989440, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.8.z" release, but it targets "4.9.0" instead
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is RELEASE_PENDING instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1989440 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.9.0, 4.9.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Oct 18 '21 01:10 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Oct 19 '21 01:10 openshift-bot

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1989440, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to target the "4.8.z" release, but it targets "4.9.0" instead
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (ERRATA) instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1989440 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.9.0, 4.9.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Oct 19 '21 01:10 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Oct 20 '21 01:10 openshift-bot

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1989440, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to target the "4.8.z" release, but it targets "4.9.0" instead
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (ERRATA) instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1989440 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.9.0, 4.9.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Oct 20 '21 01:10 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Oct 21 '21 01:10 openshift-bot

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1989440, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to target the "4.8.z" release, but it targets "4.9.0" instead
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (ERRATA) instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1989440 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.9.0, 4.9.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Oct 21 '21 01:10 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Oct 22 '21 01:10 openshift-bot

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1989440, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to target the "4.8.z" release, but it targets "4.9.0" instead
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (ERRATA) instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1989440 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.9.0, 4.9.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Oct 22 '21 01:10 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Oct 23 '21 01:10 openshift-bot

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1989440, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to target the "4.8.z" release, but it targets "4.9.0" instead
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (ERRATA) instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1989440 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.9.0, 4.9.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Oct 23 '21 01:10 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Oct 24 '21 01:10 openshift-bot

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1989440, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to target the "4.8.z" release, but it targets "4.9.0" instead
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (ERRATA) instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1989440 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.9.0, 4.9.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Oct 24 '21 01:10 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Oct 25 '21 01:10 openshift-bot

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1989440, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to target the "4.8.z" release, but it targets "4.9.0" instead
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (ERRATA) instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1989440 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.9.0, 4.9.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Oct 25 '21 01:10 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Oct 26 '21 01:10 openshift-bot

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1989440, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to target the "4.8.z" release, but it targets "4.9.0" instead
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (ERRATA) instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1989440 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.9.0, 4.9.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Oct 26 '21 01:10 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Oct 27 '21 01:10 openshift-bot

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1989440, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
expected the bug to target the "4.8.z" release, but it targets "4.9.0" instead
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (ERRATA) instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1989440 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.9.0, 4.9.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Oct 27 '21 01:10 openshift-ci[bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Oct 28 '21 01:10 openshift-bot

console console copied to clipboard

[release-4.8] Bug 2022346: Fix clusterNetwork only selection issue with OCS

console
console copied to clipboard