pkg/gcp: check error when building client
Fixes an unchecked error when building the GCP client.
I'm primarily using this to build a release image to help with debugging.
Codecov Report
Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 46.90%. Comparing base (
ac30067) to head (e0971da). Report is 64 commits behind head on master.
| Files with missing lines | Patch % | Lines |
|---|---|---|
| pkg/gcp/actuator/actuator.go | 0.00% | 1 Missing and 1 partial :warning: |
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #724 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 48.33% 46.90% -1.43%
==========================================
Files 96 102 +6
Lines 11801 12160 +359
==========================================
Hits 5704 5704
- Misses 5464 5822 +358
- Partials 633 634 +1
| Files with missing lines | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| pkg/gcp/actuator/actuator.go | 56.75% <0.00%> (-0.24%) |
:arrow_down: |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: jstuever, patrickdillon
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
The pull request process is described here
- ~~OWNERS~~ [jstuever]
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment
/override ci/prow/security This is being tracked and fixed elsewhere.
@jstuever: Overrode contexts on behalf of jstuever: ci/prow/security
In response to this:
/override ci/prow/security This is being tracked and fixed elsewhere.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.
/lgtm /approve
oh thanks! I pushed a commit before checking github and stomped on this. I would have created a bug and merged it had I noticed.
I should have marked this wip /wip
@patrickdillon: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:
| Test name | Commit | Details | Required | Rerun command |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ci/prow/security | e0971da51d42ca68e70a4b68bf36e8e154d6fbec | link | true | /test security |
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.
/hold
PR needs rebase.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.
/unassign
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.
/lifecycle stale
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.
/lifecycle rotten /remove-lifecycle stale
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.
/close
@openshift-bot: Closed this PR.
In response to this:
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue by commenting
/reopen. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting/remove-lifecycle rotten. Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting/lifecycle frozen./close
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.