NO-ISSUE: Add 4.16 rhcos images
List all the issues related to this PR
- [ ] New Feature
- [x] Enhancement
- [ ] Bug fix
- [ ] Tests
- [ ] Documentation
- [ ] CI/CD
What environments does this code impact?
- [x] Automation (CI, tools, etc)
- [ ] Cloud
- [ ] Operator Managed Deployments
- [ ] None
How was this code tested?
- [ ] assisted-test-infra environment
- [ ] dev-scripts environment
- [ ] Reviewer's test appreciated
- [x] Waiting for CI to do a full test run
- [ ] Manual (Elaborate on how it was tested)
- [ ] No tests needed
Checklist
- [x] Title and description added to both, commit and PR.
- [x] Relevant issues have been associated (see CONTRIBUTING guide)
- [x] This change does not require a documentation update (docstring,
docs, README, etc) - [ ] Does this change include unit-tests (note that code changes require unit-tests)
Reviewers Checklist
- Are the title and description (in both PR and commit) meaningful and clear?
- Is there a bug required (and linked) for this change?
- Should this PR be backported?
@danmanor: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.
In response to this:
List all the issues related to this PR
- [ ] New Feature
- [ ] Enhancement
- [ ] Bug fix
- [ ] Tests
- [ ] Documentation
- [ ] CI/CD
What environments does this code impact?
- [ ] Automation (CI, tools, etc)
- [ ] Cloud
- [ ] Operator Managed Deployments
- [x] None
How was this code tested?
- [ ] assisted-test-infra environment
- [ ] dev-scripts environment
- [ ] Reviewer's test appreciated
- [ ] Waiting for CI to do a full test run
- [ ] Manual (Elaborate on how it was tested)
- [x] No tests needed
Checklist
- [ ] Title and description added to both, commit and PR.
- [ ] Relevant issues have been associated (see CONTRIBUTING guide)
- [ ] This change does not require a documentation update (docstring,
docs, README, etc)- [ ] Does this change include unit-tests (note that code changes require unit-tests)
Reviewers Checklist
- Are the title and description (in both PR and commit) meaningful and clear?
- Is there a bug required (and linked) for this change?
- Should this PR be backported?
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.
/cc @gamli75 @adriengentil
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 67.97%. Comparing base (
fdf233a) to head (fa3162e). Report is 5 commits behind head on master.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #6326 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 68.27% 67.97% -0.31%
==========================================
Files 241 244 +3
Lines 35873 37435 +1562
==========================================
+ Hits 24493 25447 +954
- Misses 9215 9715 +500
- Partials 2165 2273 +108
/retest-required
Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD fdf233a7439008dec8ee9215f7da05b794d7ea82 and 2 for PR HEAD c7271a4da5fc36461d93170e8c67ffaf1ba50916 in total
/retest
/retest
/retest
/retest
@danmanor: all tests passed!
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: danmanor, gamli75
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
The pull request process is described here
- ~~OWNERS~~ [danmanor,gamli75]
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment