api icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
api copied to clipboard

No Release Tag Pushed since 4.1.0

Open rohanKanojia opened this issue 6 years ago • 10 comments

Hi guys,

I'm from @fabric8io team. We maintain Kubernetes and Openshift Client which is used by a lot of people in the java ecosystem. We generate Kubernetes/Openshift model from go structs in api and origin. Right now our Openshift go struct model is pointing at v4.1.0[0], but I have noticed that no other tag has been pushed since then. Even Openshift 4.3.0 got released recently.

I'm just curious why Openshift upstream maintainers are not pushing tags. It's not like we're blocked as we can update model to latest master revision. But it would be nice if we upgrade with respect to Openshift releases.

[0] https://github.com/fabric8io/kubernetes-client#compatibility-matrix

rohanKanojia avatar Feb 11 '20 08:02 rohanKanojia

@deads2k @smarterclayton @bparees @soltysh : polite ping, Would appreciate it if you could share your thoughts on this.

rohanKanojia avatar Mar 10 '20 11:03 rohanKanojia

It's still in-progress, there are several dependencies we need to handle before we'll be able to publish those.

soltysh avatar Mar 10 '20 11:03 soltysh

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale. Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close. Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

openshift-bot avatar Oct 02 '20 11:10 openshift-bot

So long as this repo remains untagged, the workaround can be go get with the desired branch name (e.g. master, release-x.x) and go.mod will pin to the SHA of the branch head.

marun avatar Oct 21 '20 03:10 marun

Yeah, we're managing with that till now. But we can't provide accurate compatibility matrices with respect to openshift versions

https://github.com/fabric8io/kubernetes-client#compatibility-matrix

rohanKanojia avatar Oct 21 '20 04:10 rohanKanojia

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten. Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity. Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten /remove-lifecycle stale

openshift-bot avatar Nov 20 '20 08:11 openshift-bot

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten. Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

openshift-bot avatar Dec 20 '20 12:12 openshift-bot

@openshift-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten. Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot avatar Dec 20 '20 12:12 openshift-ci-robot

How long does this repo plan to remain untagged? /reopen /lifecycle frozen

kaovilai avatar May 19 '23 15:05 kaovilai

@kaovilai: Reopened this issue.

In response to this:

How long does this repo plan to remain untagged? /reopen /lifecycle frozen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci[bot] avatar May 19 '23 15:05 openshift-ci[bot]