openmodelingfoundation.github.io
openmodelingfoundation.github.io copied to clipboard
openmodelingfoundation
Diversity of representatives in governance bodies
Shouldn't there be ambitions, rules for fostering/ensuring diversity (gender etc) in representatives in the OMF governance bodies, e.g. the executive committee?
Members only send one representative, so they cannot send 50:50 diverse people. And the decision who to send as rep should not depend on the gender balance in the organization.
This argument may carry to the chairs of WGs.
A suggestion to ameliorate this situation would be to double the amount of representatives in all governance bodies, to allow a 50:50 share of diversity aspects.
An organization, or organisation, is an entity—such as a company, an institution, or an association—comprising one or more people and having a particular purpose.
What about this suggestions:
"Each member organisation has at least one vote and at most two votes on the Member's council. More than one votes are given to a member organisation if it sends two representatives that identify with different aspects of diversity"
Comment by Lisa
Another point: We’ll never “get there” with diversity and inclusion if we agree that it means we have well-rounded representation of our communities (and the globe), so weaving it into the fabric of the foundation, as you’re suggesting, is important. And then looking for mechanisms to keep our diversity principles active (such as you’re suggesting with co-chairs, who will rotate periodically, thus giving the opportunity to evolve).
Sander comments: Maybe I can suggest that we create a separate document on diversity, rather than put everything in the charter or other current documents
Shelley says: AGU’s full diversity program is here…that might give some ideas for considering in the charter, or supporting documents: https://fromtheprow.agu.org/agu-releases-2020-annual-dei-report-and-new-dei-dashboard/
Comment by @lisa:
Another point: We’ll never “get there” with diversity and inclusion if we agree that it means we have well-rounded representation of our communities (and the globe), so weaving it into the fabric of the foundation, as you’re suggesting, is important. And then looking for mechanisms to keep our diversity principles active (such as you’re suggesting with co-chairs, who will rotate periodically, thus giving the opportunity to evolve).
@lisa User Notification
Hello! You're receiving this notice because you've tagged me, @lisa, on GitHub, likely in error. Lisa is a common first name, and happens to be mine. I use the @lisa username here on GitHub. While being tagged in various repositories is an interesting way for me to discover new projects, it's likely not your intention. Did you mean to tag someone else? Did you mean to use @lisa instead, in a word as word usage?
Next Steps
I'm unsubscribing from this issue, pull request or project so if you meant to tag someone else to notify them, I would recommend that. If you meant to use my user ID as a plain string, without having GitHub notify me, you can do so by wrapping with backticks (the ` character), like so: @lisa.
Comment by Austin: "To the previous conversation regarding diversity and inclusion, as a kind of compromise, could we formalize a pre-vote proceeding in which we assert our values? The proceeding could be a reading aloud our diversity and inclusion values before votes to introduce new members for example "