joss
joss copied to clipboard
openjournals
The Journal of Open Source Software
Currently only the pdf version of a paper is available, not even the abstract. However pdfs don't render well on mobiles, and are questionable on any screen type.. It would...
JOSS already does a great job of including lots of important metadata related to the software and the review in the metadata of the paper (here I'm mostly thinking of...
See https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/2930#issuecomment-751407505
I suggest we add a review criterion: * Does the software uses community/disciplinary standards for APIs and I/O, if appropriate.
The [JOSS submission requirements](https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#submission-requirements) state: ``` In addition, the software associated with your submission must: - Be stored in a repository that can be cloned without registration. - Be stored...
It often seems unclear exactly when a reviewer has finished their review. Maybe it would useful to add a final checkbox along the lines of "I'm satisfied with the current...
There is some confusion around what an acceptable author affiliation looks like for a JOSS paper. This issues is designed for us to resolve this question so that we can...
In creating the developer docs (#806), I've noticed several hard-coded values in the codebase. Specifically: - The reviewer spreadsheet ID is hard-coded in `stats.rake` on line 37 - The assignment...
Does JOSS acknowledge the reviewers somehow? For instance, in a list of reviewers in 2019, 2018, etc.
It seems that the `paper.md` file is used to generate a PDF based on a LaTeX template. It would be nice if we could use LaTeX to write the paper...
