joss-reviews
joss-reviews copied to clipboard
[REVIEW]: Caustics: A Python Package for Accelerated Strong Gravitational Lensing Simulations
Submitting author: @ConnorStoneAstro (Connor Stone) Repository: https://github.com/Ciela-Institute/caustics Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): JOSS Version: v0.10.1 Editor: @ivastar Reviewers: @andigu, @Jammy2211 Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/995fa98462eb534a32952549ef2244f8"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/995fa98462eb534a32952549ef2244f8/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/995fa98462eb534a32952549ef2244f8)
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@andigu, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
@editorialbot generate my checklist
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @ivastar know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨