[REVIEW]: quickBayes: An analytical approach to Bayesian loglikelihoods

[editorialbot]

trafficstars

Submitting author: @AnthonyLim23 (Anthony Lim) Repository: https://github.com/ISISNeutronMuon/quickBayes Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): 82_paper Version: 1.0.0b18 Editor: @osorensen Reviewers: @JonasMoss, @mattpitkin, @prashjet Archive: Pending

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2439ebe608e0c76d3147e00735dab556"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2439ebe608e0c76d3147e00735dab556/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2439ebe608e0c76d3147e00735dab556/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2439ebe608e0c76d3147e00735dab556)

Reviewers and authors:

Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)

Reviewer instructions & questions

@JonasMoss & @mattpitkin & @prashjet, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:

@editorialbot generate my checklist

The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @osorensen know.

✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨

Checklists

📝 Checklist for @JonasMoss

📝 Checklist for @mattpitkin

📝 Checklist for @prashjet