joss-reviews
joss-reviews copied to clipboard
openjournals
[PRE REVIEW]: robnptests -- An R package for robust two-sample location and variability tests
Submitting author: @s-abbas (Sermad Abbas) Repository: https://github.com/s-abbas/robnptests Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): develop Version: 1.0.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng
Status
Status badge code:
HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/99e34c86845719986f57cc82dbdd09f8"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/99e34c86845719986f57cc82dbdd09f8/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/99e34c86845719986f57cc82dbdd09f8)
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @s-abbas. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@s-abbas if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
@editorialbot commands
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.05 s (1817.6 files/s, 177080.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R 69 653 3611 1842
Markdown 9 342 0 624
TeX 2 32 0 295
Rmd 2 183 545 92
YAML 2 5 4 36
XML 1 0 1 16
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 85 1215 4161 2905
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1080/00949655.2016.1194839 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-319-41706-6 is OK
- 10.1080/00949655.2020.1788562 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-25147-5_16 is OK
- 10.1016/j.csda.2011.02.012 is OK
- 10.1007/s10260-011-0164-1 is OK
- 10.1016/j.csda.2006.12.017 is OK
- 10.1214/aoms/1177703732 is OK
- 10.3758/s13428-019-01246-w is OK
- 10.2202/1544-6115.1585 is OK
- 10.1002/9781118165485 is OK
- 10.1016/C2010-0-67044-1 is OK
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-751541-0.X5021-4 is OK
- 10.1214/aoms/1177704172 is OK
- 10.2307/2334550 is OK
- 10.1002/0470010940 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1080/03610919208813011 may be a valid DOI for title: Some robust two-sample test statistics based on M-estimators of location
INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Hi @s-abbas and thanks for your submission!
Please address:
Failed to discover a valid open source license
Also our relevant editors are fully occupied at the moment, so I will add this submission to the waitlist. Thanks for your patience.
Hi, this is the new track editor, @gkthiruvathukal checking in. I am working to get this and a growing number of track submissions reviewed. Please do bear with me (and JOSS) as there is a bit of a backlog with many of our editors at maximum number of assignments they can edit at the moment. Thank you for your patience and understanding.
Hello @gkthiruvathukal, here are the things you can ask me to do:
# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands
# Add to this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot add @username as reviewer
# Remove from this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot remove @username from reviewers
# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors
# Assign a user as the editor of this submission
@editorialbot assign @username as editor
# Remove the editor assigned to this submission
@editorialbot remove editor
# Remind an author, a reviewer or the editor to return to a review after a
# certain period of time (supported units days and weeks)
@editorialbot remind @reviewer in 2 weeks
# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references
# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository
# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist
# Set a value for version
@editorialbot set v1.0.0 as version
# Set a value for archive
@editorialbot set 10.21105/zenodo.12345 as archive
# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch
# Set a value for repository
@editorialbot set https://github.com/organization/repo as repository
# Mention the EiCs for the correct track
@editorialbot ping track-eic
# Reject paper
@editorialbot reject
# Withdraw paper
@editorialbot withdraw
# Invite an editor to edit a submission (sending them an email)
@editorialbot invite @(.*) as editor
# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf
# Recommends the submission for acceptance
@editorialbot recommend-accept
# Accept and publish the paper
@editorialbot accept
# Update data on an accepted/published paper
@editorialbot reaccept
# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint
# Flag submission with questionable scope
@editorialbot query scope
# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
# Open the review issue
@editorialbot start review
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1080/00949655.2016.1194839 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-319-41706-6 is OK
- 10.1080/00949655.2020.1788562 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-25147-5_16 is OK
- 10.1016/j.csda.2011.02.012 is OK
- 10.1007/s10260-011-0164-1 is OK
- 10.1016/j.csda.2006.12.017 is OK
- 10.1214/aoms/1177703732 is OK
- 10.3758/s13428-019-01246-w is OK
- 10.2202/1544-6115.1585 is OK
- 10.1002/9781118165485 is OK
- 10.1016/C2010-0-67044-1 is OK
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-751541-0.X5021-4 is OK
- 10.1214/aoms/1177704172 is OK
- 10.2307/2334550 is OK
- 10.1002/0470010940 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1080/03610919208813011 may be a valid DOI for title: Some robust two-sample test statistics based on M-estimators of location
INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
👋👋👋 Dear @msalibian and @mingzehuang 👋👋👋
Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?
JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled: "robnptests -- An R package for robust two-sample location and variability tests". You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4854).
The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.
This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will start the review process in a separate thread. In that thread, there will be 23 check items for each single reviewer.
Thank you in advance!
@editorialbot add @mingzehuang as reviewers
@mingzehuang - Please keep in touch. Whenever we assign a second reviewer, we will start the review in a separate thread. Thank you for accepting our invitation.
I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:
@editorialbot commands
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4947.