[PRE REVIEW]: OpenMSIStream: A Python package for facilitating integration of streaming data in diverse laboratory environments

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @eminizer (Margaret Eminizer) Repository: https://github.com/openmsi/openmsistream Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/eebecf9b018affe51a702f2a72342372"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/eebecf9b018affe51a702f2a72342372/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/eebecf9b018affe51a702f2a72342372/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/eebecf9b018affe51a702f2a72342372)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @eminizer. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@eminizer if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.14 s (1169.6 files/s, 91346.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          90            971           3048           7135
reStructuredText                60            391            187            611
Markdown                         5             35              0            115
YAML                             3              9             22            102
TeX                              1             11              0             84
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
Bourne Shell                     1              0              3             12
make                             1              4              7              9
Dockerfile                       1              4              5              6
CSS                              1              0              0              3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           164           1433           3273           8103
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1392

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.3139/9783446470460.fm may be a valid DOI for title: Apache Kafka
- 10.5040/9781784602314.00000002 may be a valid DOI for title: pandas

INVALID DOIs

- None

[kthyng]

Hi @eminizer and thanks for your submission! At the moment we have a backlog of submission and a short waitlist to wait for a relevant available editor. Thank you for your patience.

[eminizer]

No problem, thank you for the update!

[danielskatz]

@eminizer - I want to let you know that JOSS has now switched to a track-based model of editors, and since this is in the track I'm leading (Computer Science, Information Science, and Mathematics). I'll be keeping an eye on it and looking for an available editor

[danielskatz]

👋 @pibion - would you be able to edit this submission?

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot invite @pibion as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[eminizer]

@danielskatz Thank you for the update and for your help!

[danielskatz]

👋 @pibion - ping... (re the editor invitation above)

[pibion]

Hello, I'd be happy to edit this submission!

[danielskatz]

Thanks @pibion - I'll assign you, but you also should feel free to assign yourself in the future 🙂

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot assign @pibion as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @pibion is now the editor

[eminizer]

Thank you @pibion !

[pibion]

@eminizer my pleasure, I love to see data acquisition represented! Do you have anyone you would recommend as a reviewer?

[eminizer]

@pibion I don't think we have any specific recommendations from our end, thank you though : )

[pibion]

@lucask07 @briatte @ixjlyons @sptennak @SarthakJariwala

👋 would you be interested in reviewing this submission for JOSS? The goal of review is to make sure that the software and paper meet a minimum standard of best practice. Reviewers go through the checklist at https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_checklist.html and work with the author to improve anything that doesn't already meet the requirements.

[lucask07]

Hi @pibion, sure I would be happy to review this submission. For full disclosure, I've collaborated with and published papers with a co-author on this submission (Todd Hufnagel). The most recent paper was in 2011 so this fits in the allowed time frame (of at least 4 years ago in the conflict of interest policy). I'm confident I can provide a fair review.

[pibion]

@arfon could you comment on the possible COI above?

[danielskatz]

@pibion - these questions should first go to the track editor (which is me in this case, but is @openjournals/csism-eics more generally for this track). In this case, there is no COI since the collaboration was outside of the COI time period

[pibion]

@danielskatz great, thank you! I'll post to the track editor in the future!

[pibion]

@lucask07 we're good to go! I'm going to go ahead and start the review.

[pibion]

@editorialbot add @lucask07 as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@lucask07 added to the reviewers list!

[pibion]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4896.