[PRE REVIEW]: Metagenomic classification with KrakenUniq on low-memory computers

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @salzberg (Steven Salzberg) Repository: https://github.com/fbreitwieser/krakenuniq Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.1 Editor: @lpantano Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/0558bc421e6167f70639f053a4562d85"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/0558bc421e6167f70639f053a4562d85/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/0558bc421e6167f70639f053a4562d85/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/0558bc421e6167f70639f053a4562d85)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @salzberg. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@salzberg if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.07 s (1335.0 files/s, 247771.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C++                             30            929           1036           4845
C/C++ Header                    32            734           1018           3742
Perl                            13            530            585           2817
Bourne Shell                    11            142            129            707
Markdown                         7            146              0            541
CMake                            2             38             29            154
make                             2             47             45             83
TeX                              1              4              0             50
YAML                             1              1              4             18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            99           2571           2846          12957
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1332

[editorialbot]

Failed to discover a valid open source license

[editorialbot]

Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46 may be a valid DOI for title: Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments
- 10.1101/762302 may be a valid DOI for title: Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006277 may be a valid DOI for title: Removing contaminants from databases of draft genomes

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[salzberg]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @salzberg, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[kthyng]

Hi @lpantano! Could you edit this submission?

[kthyng]

@editorialbot invite @lpantano as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[lpantano]

@editorialbot assign @lpantano as editor

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[lpantano]

@kthyng happy to edit this tool.

[kthyng]

@editorialbot assign @lpantano as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @lpantano is now the editor

[kthyng]

@lpantano Didn't we type the same thing?! Not sure why it worked for me but not you. Anyway thanks!

[lpantano]

@salzberg, could you fix the missing DOI showed in this comment? I will get reviewers ASAP. Thanks

[salzberg]

@lpantano, I think what that is asking is for me to add the DOI to the bibtex file. The bibtex file was already formatted correctly and all references were there, but I just added DOIs to all of those references. Please let me know if you're asking for something else.

[lpantano]

@editorialbot assign @Jessime as reviewer

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[lpantano]

@editorialbot add @Jessime as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@Jessime added to the reviewers list!

[lpantano]

Hi @salzberg, do you have a recommendation for a reviewer? Thanks

[lpantano]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[lpantano]

@salzberg, could you add Statement of need section to the paper please (probably part is already in the introduction section) ? Thanks!

[alekseyzimin]

@lpantano Added statement of need.

[alekseyzimin]

@lplantano we suggest the following reviewers @gtonkinhill @cmorris2945 @pjb7687 @MaximLippeveld @VeroniqueLegrand @anilbey @ciropom