[PRE REVIEW]: EnsembleKalmanProcesses.jl: Derivative-free ensemble-based model calibration

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @odunbar (Oliver Dunbar) Repository: https://github.com/CliMA/EnsembleKalmanProcesses.jl Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.13.0 Editor: @jbytecode Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5cb2d4c6af8840af61b44071ae1e672a"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5cb2d4c6af8840af61b44071ae1e672a/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5cb2d4c6af8840af61b44071ae1e672a/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5cb2d4c6af8840af61b44071ae1e672a)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @odunbar. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@odunbar if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.14 s (668.2 files/s, 86472.3 lines/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                      files          blank        comment           code
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julia                            43           1570           1141           6553
Markdown                         28            622              0           1740
YAML                              8             14              5            213
TeX                               1             26              0            194
TOML                             11             22             12            157
SVG                               1              0              0             71
Bourne Again Shell                4             18             26             40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                             96           2272           1184           8968
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1415

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1029/2022MS003105 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111262 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2204.04386 is OK
- 10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<0796:DAUAEK>2.0.CO;2 is OK
- 10.1029/94JC00572 is OK
- 10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0123:ASEKFF>2.0.CO;2 is OK
- 10.1137/19M1251655 is OK
- 10.1088/0266-5611/29/4/045001 is OK
- 10.1137/19M1304891 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111559 is OK
- 10.1111/1467-9868.00294 is OK
- 10.1029/2022MS002997 is OK
- 10.1029/2020MS002454 is OK
- 10.1029/2021MS002735 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010171 is OK
- 10.48550/arxiv.2105.11341 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2201.10821 is OK
- 10.1029/2022MS002994 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109716 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[arfon]

@odunbar - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

[kthyng]

Hi @jbytecode! Could you edit this submission?

[kthyng]

@editorialbot invite @jbytecode as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[jbytecode]

@kthyng - of course, gladly!

[jbytecode]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @jbytecode is now the editor

[jbytecode]

Dear @odunbar,

Thank you for the submission. I am the handling editor.

Do you have suggestions for the potential reviewers? You can use the list of people to suggest suitable reviewers that are interested in Julia and the subject of the manuscript: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PAPRJ63yq9aPC1COLjaQp8mHmEq3rZUzwUYxTulyu78/edit

Please list them using their github usernames but do not use the @ character because we don't want to bother them by sending notifications.

Thank you in advance.

[odunbar]

We have come up with some preferred reviewers, In no particular order:

• matbesancon
• odow
• ziyiyin97
• tmigot
• juliohm

If there are significant delays, we would be happy to scour the reviewer list for other choices to move the process along!

[jbytecode]

👋👋👋 Dear @matbesancon and @odow 👋👋👋

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled: "EnsembleKalmanProcesses.jl: Derivative-free ensemble-based model calibrations". You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4811).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will start the review process in a seperate thread. In that thread, there will be 20 check items for each single reviewer.

Thank you in advance!

[odow]

Yes

[jbytecode]

@editorialbot add @odow as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@odow added to the reviewers list!

[jbytecode]

👋👋👋 Dear @ziyiyin97 👋👋👋

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled: "EnsembleKalmanProcesses.jl: Derivative-free ensemble-based model calibrations". You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4811).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will start the review process in a seperate thread. In that thread, there will be 20 check items for each single reviewer.

Thank you in advance!

[ziyiyin97]

Yes

[jbytecode]

@editorialbot add @ziyiyin97 as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@ziyiyin97 added to the reviewers list!

[jbytecode]

@odow, @ziyiyin97 - thank you for accepting our invitation. The review will start in a separate thread. I will present the instructions there.

[jbytecode]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4869.