joss-reviews
joss-reviews copied to clipboard
[PRE REVIEW]: POSEIDON: A Multidimensional Atmospheric Retrieval Code for Exoplanet Spectra
Submitting author: @MartianColonist (Ryan J. MacDonald) Repository: https://github.com/MartianColonist/POSEIDON Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss Version: v0.9.0 Editor: @dfm Reviewers: @ideasrule Managing EiC: Arfon Smith
Status
Status badge code:
HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/69710c0498d02fd1c6a0cfa4b01af7c5"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/69710c0498d02fd1c6a0cfa4b01af7c5/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/69710c0498d02fd1c6a0cfa4b01af7c5/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/69710c0498d02fd1c6a0cfa4b01af7c5)
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @MartianColonist. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@MartianColonist if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
@editorialbot commands
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.16 s (222.5 files/s, 113007.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 18 3141 3531 6701
Jupyter Notebook 5 0 2971 633
TeX 1 22 0 370
reStructuredText 6 81 68 104
Markdown 1 21 0 41
DOS Batch 1 8 1 26
YAML 2 4 10 26
make 1 4 7 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 35 3281 6588 7910
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Wordcount for paper.md
is 835
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1093/mnras/stx804 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ac47fe is OK
- 10.1088/1538-3873/aaf5ad is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201935470 is OK
- 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/137 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stab1405 is OK
- 10.1088/0004-637X/802/2/107 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0252 is OK
- 10.3847/PSJ/ac3513 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201322971 is OK
- 10.1038/nature23651 is OK
- 10.3847/2041-8213/aba9d3 is OK
- 10.3847/2041-8213/abd18e is OK
- 10.3847/0004-637X/820/1/78 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201834384 is OK
- 10.3847/2041-8213/ab8238 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/202141943 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Here are some potential reviewers with experience in the exoplanet field (and no ongoing JOSS reviews, according to the reviewer spreadsheet): Néstor Espinoza (nespinoza), Adina Feinstein (afeinstein20), or Wilfred Tyler Gee (wtgee).
@MartianColonist - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.
For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!
No problem at all!
I look forward to hearing back from an editor once the queue quietens down.
@arfon just touching base to see if an editor might be available? Thank you!
@MartianColonist I'm the EiC on call this week, and I'll have a look for editors now.
@editorialbot invite @pibion as editor
Invitation to edit this submission sent!
@pibion this may be somewhat off topic for you but can you check if you could help edit this one? We have quite backlog of papers to get through so if you think you could help that would be great. Thanks.
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman I need to decline - I have two papers that need pushing along and I wouldn't be able to start this review until those are done.
Apologies! If you still haven't found an editor when I'm done with one of my papers I'll be happy to edit.
@pibion okay that is fine. Thanks.
@editorialbot assign me as editor
Thanks all for you patience! I'm happy to edit this submission and I'll start looking for reviewers shortly.
Assigned! @dfm is now the editor
Thanks @dfm, looking forward to the review process!
@editorialbot add @ideasrule as reviewer
🎉 Thanks @ideasrule for agreeing to review this submission! As soon as we have a second reviewer lined up I'll get the main review thread going.
@ideasrule added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot add @LorenzoMugnai as reviewer
🎉 Thanks @LorenzoMugnai for agreeing to review this submission!!
I'll get the main review started in a new thread and have lots more info for you all over there. Thanks all for agreeing to be involved in this process!
@LorenzoMugnai added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4873.