[PRE REVIEW]: Metaheuristics: A Julia Package for Single- and Multi-Objective Optimization

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @jmejia8 (Jesus-Adolfo Mejia-de-Dios) Repository: https://github.com/jmejia8/Metaheuristics.jl Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper Version: v3.2.9 Editor: @vissarion Reviewers: @idoby Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/793851b3ea392048565390089bf93cf2"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/793851b3ea392048565390089bf93cf2/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/793851b3ea392048565390089bf93cf2/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/793851b3ea392048565390089bf93cf2)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @jmejia8. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@jmejia8 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.10 s (1098.8 files/s, 131385.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julia                           85           2320            603           7298
Markdown                        16            767              0           1715
TeX                              2            127              0            379
SVG                              1              1              1            138
YAML                             5             11             29             80
TOML                             3              4              0             32
CSS                              1              1              0              5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           113           3231            633           9647
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 987

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1007/978-3-642-30504-7_8 is OK
- 10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281535 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-540-31880-4_5 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.03430 is OK
- 10.1007/978-1-4615-3612-3_4 is OK
- 10.1109/TEVC.2003.810758 is OK
- 10.1109/TEVC.2020.3004012 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1007/978-981-13-0860-4_6 may be a valid DOI for title: A New Evolutionary Optimization Method Based on Center of Mass
- 10.1007/s10898-007-9149-x may be a valid DOI for title: A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm
- 10.1109/tevc.2008.925798 may be a valid DOI for title: Multiobjective optimization problems with complicated Pareto sets, MOEA/D and NSGA-II
- 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.01.008 may be a valid DOI for title: Chaotic gravitational constants for the gravitational search algorithm
- 10.1109/4235.996017 may be a valid DOI for title: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.17093/alphanumeric.576919 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[jmejia8]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @jmejia8, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[jmejia8]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1007/978-981-13-0860-4_6 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-642-30504-7_8 is OK
- 10.1007/s10898-007-9149-x is OK
- 10.1109/tevc.2008.925798 is OK
- 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.01.008 is OK
- 10.1109/4235.996017 is OK
- 10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281535 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-540-31880-4_5 is OK
- 10.17093/alphanumeric.576919 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.03430 is OK
- 10.1007/978-1-4615-3612-3_4 is OK
- 10.1109/TEVC.2003.810758 is OK
- 10.1109/TEVC.2020.3004012 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[arfon]

@editorialbot invite @vissarion as editor

:wave: @vissarion - would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[vissarion]

@editorialbot assign @vissarion as editor

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[vissarion]

@editorialbot assign @vissarion as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @vissarion is now the editor

[vissarion]

Hi @idoby, @farhadrclass, @amadeusine, @ben-schwen, @tbsexton, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[idoby]

@vissarion More than happy to give it a try but this would be my first time so bear with me please

[ben-schwen]

@vissarion Thanks for considering me, but I kindly have to decline due to other obligations.

[vissarion]

@editorialbot add @idoby as reviewer

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[vissarion]

@editorialbot add @idoby as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@idoby added to the reviewers list!

[farhadrclass]

@vissarion Thanks for considering me, unfortunately I am busy with a family medical emergency. hopefully in the future I am free.

[jmejia8]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[vissarion]

Hi @tmigot, @metelkin, @vszkafander, @kylebeggs, @justinsgray, @jbcaillau, @PaulDebus would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[PaulDebus]

Hey, I am interested but cannot promise to finish my review within the next two weeks, though I would try. If 4 weeks would also be fine, then I would review the submission.

[vissarion]

Hi @PaulDebus, sure 4 weeks is fine. Thanks!

[vissarion]

@editorialbot add @PaulDebus as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@PaulDebus added to the reviewers list!