[PRE REVIEW]: BayesCog: A freely available course in Bayesian statistics and hierarchical Bayesian modeling for psychological science
Submitting author: @sohaamir (Aamir Sohail) Repository: https://github.com/Alpn-Lab/BayesCog Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.1.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Lorena Barba
Status
Status badge code:
HTML: <a href="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/647e34f4a502ce670825a7621f67441a"><img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/647e34f4a502ce670825a7621f67441a/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/647e34f4a502ce670825a7621f67441a)
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @sohaamir. Currently, there isn't a JOSE editor assigned to your paper.
@sohaamir if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSE submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
@editorialbot commands
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.98 T=0.05 s (1287.5 files/s, 179259.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R 40 1081 1065 3142
Text 13 0 0 2418
TeX 1 48 0 402
Markdown 2 100 6 220
YAML 4 15 7 217
Lua 2 29 41 201
CSS 1 17 9 59
Dockerfile 1 9 34 37
JSON 1 0 0 19
JavaScript 1 0 12 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 66 1299 1174 6716
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
66 Aamir Sohail
6 sohaamir
4 allcontributors[bot]
Paper file info:
🚨 Wordcount for paper.md is 2075
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section
License info:
🔴 License found: Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International (Not OSI approved)
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Suggested reviewers listed in Google Sheet:
Other potential reviewers not listed in Google sheet:
@editorialbot commands
Hello @sohaamir, here are the things you can ask me to do:
# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands
# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors
# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist
# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set jose-paper as branch
# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository
# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references
# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf
# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint
# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
Here's the current list of reviewers: https://bit.ly/jose-reviewers
@editorialbot list editors
List of JOSE editors
@JasonJWilliamsNY
@ShanEllis
@acocac
@allisonhorst
@arm61
@ashleefv
@bleds22e
@csev
@csoneson
@diazrenata
@emckiernan
@ethanwhite
@juanklopper
@kls2177
@kyleniemeyer
@labarba
@lgatto
@magsol
@mikelove
@moorepants
@nicoguaro
@quirksahern
@rougier
@stats-tgeorge
@steflangehennig
@ttimbers
@yabellini
Hi @labarba, is there a way for me to assign specific reviewers and editor as I have observed in other submissions? I would have also done so originally when submitting but did not see the option.
i.e., instead of:
Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending
We would have (for example):
Editor: [at]JasonJWilliamsNY Reviewers: [at]TomDonoghue, [at]arokem
No. Those are editorial functions only. Thank you for your patience. We do carry a long backlog, with a volunteer-only team.