openjournals
[PRE REVIEW]: Teaching Python package development: A structured course with learning resources and an instructor's guide
Submitting author: @geritwagner (Gerit Wagner) Repository: https://github.com/digital-work-lab/open-source-project Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): jose Version: v0.2.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Lorena Barba
Status
Status badge code:
HTML: <a href="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/cc49b9604b9fd10bc8524d1539620be6"><img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/cc49b9604b9fd10bc8524d1539620be6/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/cc49b9604b9fd10bc8524d1539620be6)
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @geritwagner. Currently, there isn't a JOSE editor assigned to your paper.
@geritwagner if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSE submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
@editorialbot commands
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.98 T=0.04 s (1749.1 files/s, 217205.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Markdown 45 1834 369 3946
Text 3 2 0 1013
XML 1 0 0 685
TeX 3 29 20 636
YAML 9 51 15 380
Python 2 50 40 127
make 2 18 9 75
CSS 1 19 5 58
SCSS 1 7 0 41
SVG 8 0 0 8
HTML 1 1 0 0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 76 2011 458 6969
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
466 Gerit Wagner
84 LaureenTh
17 Links Fixer
12 Carlo
9 Laureen Thurner
9 Stella1234-design
7 dependabot[bot]
3 github-actions[bot]
Paper file info:
🚨 Wordcount for paper.md is 3647
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.98 T=0.04 s (1764.8 files/s, 215493.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Markdown 45 1804 248 3939
Text 3 2 0 1013
XML 1 0 0 685
TeX 3 29 20 636
YAML 9 51 15 380
Python 2 50 40 127
make 2 18 9 75
CSS 1 19 5 58
SCSS 1 7 0 41
SVG 8 0 0 8
HTML 1 1 0 0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 76 1981 337 6962
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
468 Gerit Wagner
84 LaureenTh
17 Links Fixer
12 Carlo
9 Laureen Thurner
9 Stella1234-design
7 dependabot[bot]
3 github-actions[bot]
Paper file info:
🚨 Wordcount for paper.md is 2351
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section
Thank you for opening the pre-review issue. I just fixed the paper.md to ensure that the pdf is generated successfully and removed material in comments for a more adequate word count. I also included the standard Creative Commons (CC-BY) license.
I have reviewed the list of potential reviewers and identified the following people as a strong fit:
- mcburton
- krother
- gcdeshpande
- mattforshaw
- fbidu
- lechten
@NickleDave — would you be willing to help us out with a review of this submission to The Journal of Open Source Education, JOSE? We still need to assign a handling editor, but I thought of you for reviewing since you did such a wonderful job of presenting about Python packaging at last year's URSSI Summer School at GW.
Might you also suggest a couple of other people to review? (We need two to proceed.)
Hi @labarba I'm happy to review.
I see the intro references pyOpenSci and py-pkgs.org -- I wonder if @lwasser @tomasbeuzen @ttimbers have ideas for potential reviewers (apologies for tagging you in, I know y'all are busy folks)
👋 @ashleefv – could you take this JOSE submission as editor? (Teaching Python package development: A structured course with learning resources and an instructor's guide) We already have one agreed reviewer, and perhaps a second reviewer could be one of the authors of this other JOSE paper: https://jose.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/jose.00130
I'm sorry @ashleefv, I'm afraid I can't do that. That's something only eics are allowed to do.
Hello @ashleefv, here are the things you can ask me to do:
# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands
# Add to this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot add @username as reviewer
# Remove from this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot remove @username from reviewers
# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors
# Assign a user as the editor of this submission
@editorialbot assign @username as editor
# Remove the editor assigned to this submission
@editorialbot remove editor
# Remind an author, a reviewer or the editor to return to a review after a
# certain period of time (supported units days and weeks)
@editorialbot remind @reviewer in 2 weeks
# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist
# Set a value for version
@editorialbot set v1.0.0 as version
# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set jose-paper as branch
# Set a value for repository
@editorialbot set https://github.com/organization/repo as repository
# Set a value for the archive DOI
@editorialbot set 10.5281/zenodo.6861996 as archive
# Mention the EiCs for the correct track
@editorialbot ping track-eic
# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository
# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references
# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf
# Recommends the submission for acceptance
@editorialbot recommend-accept
# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint
# Flag submission with questionable scope
@editorialbot query scope
# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
# Creates a post-review checklist with editor and authors tasks
@editorialbot create post-review checklist
# Open the review issue
@editorialbot start review
@marisalim Are you available to review this submission to The Journal of Open Source Education, JOSE? It seems related to your own previous publication: https://jose.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/jose.00130
@ACharbonneau @abhijna @marisalim @s-canchi @ctb Are you available to review this submission to The Journal of Open Source Education, JOSE? It seems related to your own previous publication: https://jose.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/jose.00130
