openjournals
[PRE REVIEW]: Python-based Lagrange analytical mechanics course
Submitting author: @bettachini (Bettachini, V. A.) Repository: https://github.com/unlam/ComputationalAnalyticalMechanics/ Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Lorena Barba
Status
Status badge code:
HTML: <a href="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/722bf6629b0b6dbb72db8ecd6ed3cb19"><img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/722bf6629b0b6dbb72db8ecd6ed3cb19/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/722bf6629b0b6dbb72db8ecd6ed3cb19)
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @bettachini. Currently, there isn't a JOSE editor assigned to your paper.
@bettachini if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSE submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
@editorialbot commands
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.07 s (1149.4 files/s, 485819.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jupyter Notebook 35 0 25758 2332
SVG 9 4 4 1815
TeX 15 260 114 1287
Sass 12 240 59 965
Markdown 3 193 0 562
HTML 5 29 60 103
YAML 1 4 11 14
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 80 730 26006 7078
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
27 frautn
9 edg
1 Víctor Alexis Bettachini
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 2858
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
✅ OK DOIs
- 10.1109/TE.2013.2249066 is OK
- 10.21105/jose.00192 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.17081/psico.24.46.4492 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-642-50995-7_7 is OK
- 10.7717/peerj-cs.103 is OK
- 10.1186/s12909-015-0317-2 is OK
- 10.1021/acsomega.2c00362 is OK
🟡 SKIP DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Lagrange’s Method in Physics/Mechanics - SymPy 1.1...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Dynamics, Theory and Applications
- No DOI given, and none found for title: ME41056: Multibody Dynamics
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Learn Multibody Dynamics
❌ MISSING DOIs
- 10.1021/acsomega.2c00362 may be a valid DOI for title: Google colab and virtual simulations: practical e-...
- 10.17081/psico.24.46.4492 may be a valid DOI for title: Creatividad y enfoques de aprendizaje en estudiant...
- 10.18260/1-2--22585 may be a valid DOI for title: The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research
❌ INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Dear @labarba, I can possibly edit this one, but I have one concern. Most of the materials are in Spanish. Do we only accept English materials? I have very basic understanding of Spanish myself, so I can't read such technical writing. The repository says that the materials will have an English translation in the future, but it doesn't seem to be the case presently. How should that be handled?
hi everybody. @emckiernan has agreed to shepherd this submission. Thank you all for your patience!
@bettachini – your materials are both in English and Spanish. The challenge is thus that we need two reviewers who are also bilingual. If you have any recommended reviewers, please comment here (but without @-mentioning them, please).
Hi, @nicoguaro! I'm writing as the editor of this submission, and reaching out because you previously signed up to review for JOSE. Would you like to contribute a review for this submission? Please let me know if you're available and willing. Thanks in advance for considering!
@emckiernan, I am also an editor of JOSE and have one JOSS review pending. If you can wait around a month for me to start, I could accept.
Thanks for your quick response, @nicoguaro! I think we're looking to get the review process started sooner, but in case we're not able to find reviewers in that time, I'll definitely reach back out.
Hi, @richmf, thanks for accepting my invitation over email! I'll tag you below to formally assign you as a reviewer. The materials to review are in the repository linked at the top of this page. And here are the reviewer guidelines: https://openjournals.readthedocs.io/en/jose/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions, please just let me know. Thanks again!
Hi, @dpshelio! I'm writing as the editor of this submission, and reaching out because you previously signed up to review for JOSE. Would you like to contribute a review for this submission? Please let me know if you're available and willing. Thanks in advance for considering!
Hi, @richmf, thanks for accepting my invitation over email! I'll tag you below to formally assign you as a reviewer. The materials to review are in the repository linked at the top of this page. And here are the reviewer guidelines: https://openjournals.readthedocs.io/en/jose/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions, please just let me know. Thanks again!
Thanks. I'll check the reviewer guidelines.
trans Hi everyone. We, the co-authors, want to thank you for your effort in finding bilingual reviewers. A few months ago we wanted to address the inconvenience to the reviewers of not having an English translation. Sadly, we hadn't advanced a lot towards that goal. You can find the contents of the first two directories fully translated here: https://github.com/unlam/ComputationalAnalyticalMechanics
@bettachini – your materials are both in English and Spanish. The challenge is thus that we need two reviewers who are also bilingual. If you have any recommended reviewers, please comment here (but without @-mentioning them, please).
A fellow mechanical engineer, from an institution neither of the co-authors works at, said he could review the article. How should we send you his contact details?
Hi, @bettachini, could you please send me an email at [email protected] with his contact info? Thanks!
Hi, @dpshelio! I'm writing as the editor of this submission, and reaching out because you previously signed up to review for JOSE. Would you like to contribute a review for this submission? Please let me know if you're available and willing. Thanks in advance for considering!
Hi, @dpshelio, just checking back in. Might you be able to contribute a review for this?
A fellow mechanical engineer, from an institution neither of the co-authors works at, said he could review the article. How should we send you his contact details?
Hi, @bettachini, just to update you...I sent the invite on Thursday, but waiting to hear back.
Hi, @bettachini, just to update you...I sent the invite on Thursday, but waiting to hear back.
Hi, @bettachini, checking in again...have you heard anything from the professor you identified as a potential reviewer? I sent the invite by email but haven't heard back. Maybe it went to his spam? Would be great to know if he is still willing.
Hi @emckiernan. I'd just been informed that Ferrari was unable to find anything on the subject on his e-mail. I'll send you again his address to your google e-mail. Sorry for the delay, but I do not know him personally and communication with him is through a third party.
Hi @emckiernan. I'd just been informed that Ferrari was unable to find anything on the subject on his e-mail. I'll send you again his address to your google e-mail. Sorry for the delay, but I do not know him personally and communication with him is through a third party.
Thanks so much, @bettachini, I've resent the invite to him. Fingers crossed!
Hi, @bettachini. I think you're aware, but just for the record here...last week I received a response from Dr. Ferrari that he is unable to review this submission. So, the search for a second reviewer continues. I'll do my best to find someone as soon as possible, but if you have any other suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! And thanks also for your patience.