jose-reviews
jose-reviews copied to clipboard
[PRE REVIEW]: Can you predict the future? A tutorial for the National Ecological Observatory Network Ecological Forecasting Challenge
Submitting author: @OlssonF (Freya Olsson) Repository: https://github.com/OlssonF/NEON-forecast-challenge-workshop Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main Version: v1.1.0 Editor: @acocac Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Lorena Barba
Status
Status badge code:
HTML: <a href="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/37e9e48c49abf89a619b787d106d79bd"><img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/37e9e48c49abf89a619b787d106d79bd/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/37e9e48c49abf89a619b787d106d79bd/status.svg)](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/37e9e48c49abf89a619b787d106d79bd)
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @OlssonF. Currently, there isn't a JOSE editor assigned to your paper.
@OlssonF if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSE submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
@editorialbot commands
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.02 s (569.7 files/s, 178106.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Markdown 5 451 0 1837
Rmd 4 400 592 599
TeX 1 9 0 105
R 2 9 7 32
YAML 1 1 4 18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 13 870 603 2591
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.5281/zenodo.8316965 is OK
- 10.1002/fee.2616 is OK
- 10.1002/ecs2.2567 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01686 is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.1710231115 is OK
- 10.1111/2041-210X.13955 is OK
- 10.1515/9781400885459 is OK
- 10.21105/jose.00198 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
Wordcount for paper.md
is 2340
@OlssonF 👋 Let me start with an apology: I am the editor-in-chief and I have neglected JOSE for several months due to plain overwhelm. I have cut down on other service and am back here with intention of reviving our little alt-journal. Thank you for your submission! Given the time that has passed, do you have updates to the paper?
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
@labarba Since the submission we have continued to develop and improve the tutorial and so some edits have been made to the code. We have made some minor edits to the paper.md
this week that reflect these changes.
For reviewers, we would suggest S. K. Morgan Ernest, who recently published with you. In addition, from your reviewers database we suggest Jeffrey Hollister and/or Jem Stachelek, both R coders with backgrounds in ecology.
Thanks