openjournals
[PRE REVIEW]: Good Enough Practices in Scientific Computing: A Learning Module for Researchers
Submitting author: @ewallace (Edward Wallace) Repository: https://github.com/carpentries-lab/good-enough-practices Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1 Editor: @kyleniemeyer Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Lorena Barba
Status
Status badge code:
HTML: <a href="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/c4c7c68b676558abcf1c1b0092e7eac5"><img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/c4c7c68b676558abcf1c1b0092e7eac5/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/c4c7c68b676558abcf1c1b0092e7eac5)
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @ewallace. Currently, there isn't a JOSE editor assigned to your paper.
The AEiC suggestion for the handling editor is @JasonJWilliamsNY.
@ewallace if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSE submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
@editorialbot commands
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.02 s (1551.8 files/s, 196274.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Markdown 25 1044 0 2590
YAML 9 88 51 605
TeX 1 5 0 44
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 35 1137 51 3239
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
@ewallace 👋 Let me start with an apology: I am the editor-in-chief and I have neglected JOSE for several months due to plain overwhelm. I have cut down on other service and am back here with intention of reviving our little alt-journal. Thank you for your submission! Given the time that has passed, do you have updates to the paper?
@JasonJWilliamsNY — This lesson has already been peer reviewed and accepted at The Carpentries Lab https://github.com/carpentries-lab/reviews/issues/24
@labarba thank you, this is great news! I've read through the paper and don't have any immediate updates. The carpentries lab reviews covered the materials and lesson, but did not review the paper.md. So I'll look forward to editorial comments from @JasonJWilliamsNY and be ready to revise in response to those.
HI @labarba thanks - I won't be able to take on editorial work until after the summer
@kyleniemeyer — I've invited you to steer this JOSE submission through the fast-track publication, as it has already been through the Carpentries review. Can you help us out? (@JasonJWilliamsNY : might you kindly give Kyle a little summary of the fast-track process?)
Hi @ewallace, the work here is just focused on the paper. I think the presence of the date field is causing the compilation to fail (just my guess, though). Could you remove that?