openjournals
[PRE REVIEW]: Cerbo: A Student-Friendly Library for Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
Submitting author: @anaiy2004 (Anaiy Somalwar) Repository: https://github.com/StartOnAI/Cerbo Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v0.3.3 Editor: Pending Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Lorena Barba
Status
Status badge code:
HTML: <a href="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/a10e4b5ff79f103e4f0ba2835fb3661d"><img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/a10e4b5ff79f103e4f0ba2835fb3661d/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/a10e4b5ff79f103e4f0ba2835fb3661d)
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @anaiy2004. Currently, there isn't an JOSE editor assigned to your paper.
@anaiy2004 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSE and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSE submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
@whedon commands
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSE is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.28 s (106.2 files/s, 69535.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jupyter Notebook 21 0 16620 1104
Python 5 379 516 857
Markdown 3 45 0 105
TeX 1 2 0 22
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 30 426 17136 2088
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository '932fe5640eeb13d7cd0ca8f1' was
gathered on 2021/08/17.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
Sauman Das 8 133 22 6.67
karthik 8 638 231 37.39
karthikb19 8 1267 33 55.94
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
Karthik Bhargav 946 100.0 0.1 4.55
Sauman Das 130 97.7 0.4 7.69
karthik 676 106.0 0.9 5.03
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Here are some things you can ask me to do:
# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands
# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors
# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers
EDITORIAL TASKS
# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf
# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name
# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references
# Ask Whedon to check repository statistics for the submitted software
@whedon check repository
hi @anaiy2004 👋 Thank you for your submission to JOSE. I've had a look at it, and the core of it seems to be a package that acts as wrapper code to use external machine learning frameworks. At just over 800 lines of Python, and its wrapper functionality, this would not pass the bar for independent publication. Your project sounds very interesting, though. I see that you have a number of Jupyter notebooks in the repository, and talk of other educational materials created as part of the effort. If you were to turn the notebooks into fully narrated tutorials, then it could make a fuller JOSE submission. Have a think and let us know.
Thank you for your suggestion! We will work towards making our notebooks fully narrated tutorials.
Hi @anaiy2004 👋 Just checking in to see how the revisions are going? If you can't get to them for a while I can put a pause on this until you're ready - let me know. Thank you!
Hi @anaiy2004 👋 I added a paused label on this one so it doesn't pop up on our weekly audit of in-progress submissions. Please get back to us when you are ready to move forward. Thank you!
@jgorzalski I apologize for the late response; for some reason, I did not get a notifaction. I will make sure to reply on this thread when we are ready for another review. We are currently working on the tutorials so we can have a more full submission.