chore: update help text of top responses setting and translations

[tecoholic]

TL;DR - Add a small change on help text of "Top Responses" setting to make it clearer to instructor. This is a re-done PR in place of #1870 as @ngdangdat couldn't get the CLA Signed.

JIRA: NA

What changed?

• Help text of the "Top Responses" setting
• Related translation files

Developer Checklist

• [x] Reviewed the release process
• [x] Translations and JS/SASS compiled
• [ ] Bumped version number in setup.py and package.json

Testing Instructions

• Checkout branch open-craft:update-help-text-of-top-reponses-setting
• Install edx-ora2 xblock on the feature branch to Studio (CMS)
• Restart CMS
• Add a ORA block in a unit
• Edit > Settings
• Make sure the changed text show up properly

Reviewer Checklist

Collectively, these should be completed by reviewers of this PR:

• [ ] I've done a visual code review
• [ ] I've tested the new functionality

FYI: @openedx/content-aurora

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @tecoholic! Please note that it may take us up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

Feel free to add as much of the following information to the ticket as you can:

• supporting documentation
• Open edX discussion forum threads
• timeline information ("this must be merged by XX date", and why that is)
• partner information ("this is a course on edx.org")
• any other information that can help Product understand the context for the PR

All technical communication about the code itself will be done via the GitHub pull request interface. As a reminder, our process documentation is here.

Please let us know once your PR is ready for our review and all tests are green.

[natabene]

@tecoholic Thank you for your contribution, I am kicking off the tests.

[tecoholic]

@natabene Thank you.

Note to the reviewer: The tests are failing due to CodeCov API call failing.

[itsjeyd]

Hey @tecoholic, should we keep this PR open or can it be closed?

[tecoholic]

@itsjeyd I think it is still relevant. It is a copy of the @gabrieldamours' change here.

@gabrieldamours Can you kindly confirm?

This might require a rebase/recompiling on master. I can updated it once it is confirmed.

[itsjeyd]

Sounds good @tecoholic, thanks for the update.

[gabrieldamours]

@tecoholic yep, this PR is still relevant 👍

[itsjeyd]

@tecoholic @gabrieldamours OK great! I'll let you schedule the next steps for an upcoming OpenCraft sprint :)

@mphilbrick211 In the meantime, we should probably label this as waiting for author (or move it to the Blocked column on the contributions board)?

[tecoholic]

@itsjeyd Hi, I have re-based this on the master and updated the PR. Who should I ping to review this?

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Base: 94.98% // Head: 94.98% // No change to project coverage :thumbsup:

Coverage data is based on head (7b951c6) compared to base (5fa43f2). Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1883   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.98%   94.98%           
=======================================
  Files         153      153           
  Lines       17044    17044           
  Branches     1873     1873           
=======================================
  Hits        16189    16189           
  Misses        641      641           
  Partials      214      214           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	94.98% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[mphilbrick211]

My apologies for not seeing this. It looks like this is ready to be reviewed and merged! Looks like @mattcarter can review as he is the contact for the repo.

[itsjeyd]

@tecoholic @mphilbrick211 Thanks for the updates :+1:

[openedx-webhooks]

@tecoholic 🎉 Your pull request was merged! Please take a moment to answer a two question survey so we can improve your experience in the future.