Gs lab splunk hashes fix

[deepakjoshi01234]

we have looked at adding hashes to the response and mapping them in file hashes and process hashes.

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[mdazam1942]

@deepakjoshi01234 can you please address the comments and fix it if necessary? Thanks!

[deepakjoshi01234]

@mdazam1942 sure ,we are trying to fix these mappings and will update you by the end of this week.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #962 (d6c1c68) into develop (9409686) will decrease coverage by 0.02%. The diff coverage is 52.08%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #962      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    64.74%   64.71%   -0.03%     
===========================================
  Files          519      519              
  Lines        48879    48902      +23     
===========================================
+ Hits         31645    31649       +4     
- Misses       17234    17253      +19     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...er_modules/splunk/stix_translation/splunk_utils.py	76.47% <0.00%> (+5.88%)	:arrow_up:
...er_modules/splunk/stix_translation/transformers.py	40.00% <ø> (-50.00%)	:arrow_down:
...ules/splunk/stix_transmission/results_connector.py	50.00% <13.04%> (-40.48%)	:arrow_down:
...dules/splunk/stix_translation/query_constructor.py	73.43% <88.88%> (+0.75%)	:arrow_up:
...tests/stix_translation/test_splunk_json_to_stix.py	55.76% <92.30%> (+1.00%)	:arrow_up:
.../tests/stix_translation/test_splunk_stix_to_spl.py	83.62% <100.00%> (-0.37%)	:arrow_down:
... and 1 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.