BGP&OSPF：no route advertisement is defined？

[andersliuc]

Hi， I am confused whether the route advertisement is defined in bgp and ospf models like the CLI “network” in Cisco. Is that in route-policy model?

[robshakir]

This is defined in the local routing model as aggregates. The network instance model's table connections is then used to redistribute the routes into the relevant protocols. Please take a look and see if this makes sense to you.

r.

On Wed, 8 Nov 2017, 05:12 andersliuc, [email protected] wrote:

Hi， I am confused whether the route advertisement is defined in bgp and ospf models like the CLI “network” in Cisco. Is that in route-policy model?

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openconfig/public/issues/106, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEnN1fbpBP1iK09XPUL5GiSWcyvf2rGrks5s0ajPgaJpZM4QWW4X .

[andersliuc]

Hi，thank you for your reply and I have a new question showed below:

1. I want to advertise a route through BGP. As the method you mentioned above, I firstly defined route in the local routing model as aggregates，then I use the table connection with leaf of src protocol,dst protocol and address family，but there is no attribute relate to which route I want to redistribute in the table connection (in other words, I defined many routes though aggregates and I just want to advertise one of them in bgp).

Look forward to your reply！Many thanks!

[robshakir]

In table-connection/config we have an import-policy leaf, this means that we can specify a policy that will match the particular route that is created as an aggregate. I think that this should allow such filtering.

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue is stale because it has been open 180 days with no activity. If you wish to keep this issue active, please remove the stale label or add a comment, otherwise will be closed in 14 days.