quartz-frontend
quartz-frontend copied to clipboard
Feedback: Aggregation by NG Zones
Detailed Description
It might be a good idea to aggregate by NG zones.
Context
- Could be these
- We've also discussed Wind constraint boundaries too
- Could be DNO's too
Possible Implementation
- Todo
https://assets.elexon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/28170121/CVA_CC235.pdf
Here's some groupings that might help
zones['z1'] = [139,288, 203,57,43, 138, 179, 262,12,6, 18, 94,42,114, 204, 108,154,115,59,239,127,29, 87]
zones['z2'] = [125,225,259, 224,195, 21,282, 232,313,120,99,77,248,311,121, 39]
zones['z3'] = [284,236,50, 98]
zones['z4'] = [11,173,241, 168, 293, 73, 192, 10,200, 268, 277,147,33,46,2,81,247,303,153,97, 193, 93, 62,183,132,131,278, 85, 260,]
zones['z5'] = [22,102,96,71,145, 128,61,95,51, 208,130,198, 185, 161, 184, 252, 170, 171, 172,205,234, 76,244, 129,105, 69,104,
14,270,149,84,159,31, 79,106,70,167,15,137, 279, 112, 80,44,90,82,265,86,285,306,263,133,91,107,134,141,255, 169,63,
222, 58,237,123,304,35,223, 83]
zones['z6'] = [228,27,143, 215,178,144,301,271,276,124,294, 272,275,218,146,253]
zones['z7'] = [220,177,119,78, 254,136,162,52,89, 118,235,175, 289,287]
zones['z8'] = [316,230,292,182,72, 25,54,126,122,56,148,231, 28,249,186,165,163,305,37,264,166,273,109,36,221,240,267,312,60,156,
194,269]
zones['z9'] = [24,298,302,274,66]
zones['z10'] = [111,74,135,103,142,23,206,250,243,309,48, 256, 88,49,308,217]
zones['z11'] = [214,297,38,101,47,226,317,280, 9,34]
zones['z12'] = [227,281,242,26,117,296,295,3,238,196,7,55,155,202, 75,190,229,176,219]
zones['z13'] = [4,5,246, 251,40,110,300,315,291,65,158,310, 209,67,201,100,211,20,266,140,157, 17,189,19,180,150,187,188,]
zones['z14'] = [53,258,245,164,174,290,299,210,314]
zones['z15'] = [116,191,212,30,41,216,32]
zones['z16'] = [8,152,181,1,113,283,64,45,197,199,257]
Are they GSP, or GNodes? OR..? Looks like might help. Do you have the source of those, as might refer to them.
Probably good stuff to talk to NG about, as they will be super attuned to constraint boundaries that are most important.. I wonder if we shoudl have added this to the list of possible enhancements to an extension.
Further feedback
- Zonal information would be great as they almost map with the Constraint Boundaries.
- If it was possible to select multiple zones at once, that would be great
This might also help - https://www.nationalgrideso.com/research-and-publications/electricity-ten-year-statement-etys/electricity-transmission-network/scottish-boundaries
Might be a good idea to add the zones to the GSP location table, add dno tag to it aswell
Jamie Taylor referenced teh same NGESO site as above.
We had another customer feedback that they wanted this today. Reference that Z16 is very important