Add Ancient Chinese History Knowledge eval

[lyz1990]

Thank you for contributing an eval! ♥️

🚨 Please make sure your PR follows these guidelines, failure to follow the guidelines below will result in the PR being closed automatically. Note that even if the criteria are met, that does not guarantee the PR will be merged nor GPT-4 access granted. 🚨

PLEASE READ THIS:

In order for a PR to be merged, it must fail on GPT-4. We are aware that right now, users do not have access, so you will not be able to tell if the eval fails or not. Please run your eval with GPT-3.5-Turbo, but keep in mind as we run the eval, if GPT-4 gets higher than 90% on the eval, we will likely reject since GPT-4 is already capable of completing the task.

We plan to roll out a way for users submitting evals to see the eval performance on GPT-4 soon. Stay tuned! Until then, you will not be able to see the eval performance on GPT-4. Starting April 10, the minimum eval count is 15 samples, we hope this makes it easier to create and contribute evals.

Eval details 📑

Eval name

basic-test-on-ancient-chinese-history-01

Eval description

This eval consists of single-choice questions covering various topics, including historical events, important figures, dynasties, and cultural aspects of ancient China.

What makes this a useful eval?

The eval covers a wide range of topics within ancient Chinese history, providing a comprehensive assessment of the model's understanding of this domain. gpt-3.5-turbo: 0.3333333333333333 gpt-4: 0.6

Criteria for a good eval ✅

Below are some of the criteria we look for in a good eval. In general, we are seeking cases where the model does not do a good job despite being capable of generating a good response (note that there are some things large language models cannot do, so those would not make good evals).

Your eval should be:

• [x] Thematically consistent: The eval should be thematically consistent. We'd like to see a number of prompts all demonstrating some particular failure mode. For example, we can create an eval on cases where the model fails to reason about the physical world.
• [x] Contains failures where a human can do the task, but either GPT-4 or GPT-3.5-Turbo could not.
• [x] Includes good signal around what is the right behavior. This means either a correct answer for Basic evals or the Fact Model-graded eval, or an exhaustive rubric for evaluating answers for the Criteria Model-graded eval.
• [x] Include at least 15 high quality examples.

If there is anything else that makes your eval worth including, please document it below.

Unique eval value

In addition to the reasons mentioned above, I will continually provide more data to keep this eval updated and relevant for future LLM iterations.

Eval structure 🏗️

Your eval should

• [x] Check that your data is in evals/registry/data/{name}
• [x] Check that your yaml is registered at evals/registry/evals/{name}.yaml
• [x] Ensure you have the right to use the data you submit via this eval

(For now, we will only be approving evals that use one of the existing eval classes. You may still write custom eval classes for your own cases, and we may consider merging them in the future.)

Final checklist 👀

Submission agreement

By contributing to Evals, you are agreeing to make your evaluation logic and data under the same MIT license as this repository. You must have adequate rights to upload any data used in an Eval. OpenAI reserves the right to use this data in future service improvements to our product. Contributions to OpenAI Evals will be subject to our usual Usage Policies (https://platform.openai.com/docs/usage-policies).

• [x] I agree that my submission will be made available under an MIT license and complies with OpenAI's usage policies.

Email address validation

If your submission is accepted, we will be granting GPT-4 access to a limited number of contributors. Access will be given to the email address associated with the merged pull request.

• [x] I acknowledge that GPT-4 access will only be granted, if applicable, to the email address used for my merged pull request.

Limited availability acknowledgement

We know that you might be excited to contribute to OpenAI's mission, help improve our models, and gain access to GPT-4. However, due to the requirements mentioned above and high volume of submissions, we will not be able to accept all submissions and thus not grant everyone who opens a PR GPT-4 access. We know this is disappointing, but we hope to set the right expectation before you open this PR.

• [x] I understand that opening a PR, even if it meets the requirements above, does not guarantee the PR will be merged nor GPT-4 access granted.

Submit eval

• [x] I have filled out all required fields in the evals PR form
• [ ] (Ignore if not submitting code) I have run pip install pre-commit; pre-commit install and have verified that black, isort, and autoflake are running when I commit and push

Failure to fill out all required fields will result in the PR being closed.

Eval JSON data

Since we are using Git LFS, we are asking eval submitters to add in as many Eval Samples (at least 5) from their contribution here:

View evals in JSON

Eval

{"input": [{"role": "system", "content": "请阅读以下中国古代史常识题，A、B、C、D四个选项中有且只有一个正确选项，请以大写字母回答正确的选项，回答中不需要额外的文本"}, {"role": "user", "content": "下列各种器物中，可能成为大汶口文化晚期墓葬随葬品的是:①麻织成的布    ②玉石制成的串饰 ③骨制的箭头 ④黑陶器物。 A.①②③④   B.①②④  C.②③④   D.②④"}], "ideal": "B"}
{"input": [{"role": "system", "content": "请阅读以下中国古代史常识题，A、B、C、D四个选项中有且只有一个正确选项，请以大写字母回答正确的选项，回答中不需要额外的文本"}, {"role": "user", "content": "尧、舜、禹的传说反映了当时：①没有贵贱之分   ②实行民主推选首领的制度 ③原始社会走向解体   ④贫富分化加剧   A.①②③   B.②③④   C.①②③④  D.②③"}], "ideal": "B"}
{"input": [{"role": "system", "content": "请阅读以下中国古代史常识题，A、B、C、D四个选项中有且只有一个正确选项，请以大写字母回答正确的选项，回答中不需要额外的文本"}, {"role": "user", "content": "河姆渡文化和半坡文化的相似之处有:  ①人们过着定居生活    ②进入原始农耕时期   ③创造了著名的彩陶文化   ④人们会织麻布，制麻衣   A.①②    B.②③    C.①②③   D.①②③④"}], "ideal": "A"}
{"input": [{"role": "system", "content": "请阅读以下中国古代史常识题，A、B、C、D四个选项中有且只有一个正确选项，请以大写字母回答正确的选项，回答中不需要额外的文本"}, {"role": "user", "content": "大汶口文化中晚期:    ①我国一些地区相继进入父系氏族公社时期  ②出现了陶器新品种黑陶和白陶 ③玉器生产的工艺水平高   ④养蚕缫丝，纺织技术进步 A.①②③   B.②③④   C.①③④   D.①②③④"}], "ideal": "D"}
{"input": [{"role": "system", "content": "请阅读以下中国古代史常识题，A、B、C、D四个选项中有且只有一个正确选项，请以大写字母回答正确的选项，回答中不需要额外的文本"}, {"role": "user", "content": "下列各项关于禹的各项表述中，不准确的是  A.黄河流域的部落联盟首领 B.建立夏朝  C.以王位世袭制代替了禅让制  D.治理黄河有功"}], "ideal": "C"}

[lyz1990]

Thanks for submitting this eval! I would like to recommend some changes.

• The system's prompt seems ambiguous. It's better to mention in the prompt respond with the correct option letter in capital case, no additional text is required in the response. Modifying the prompt's content may result in better accuracy.

We would love to review your PR again after the suggested changes are incorporated.

Thank you very much for feedback. I have revised the system's prompt according to your suggestions to be more explicit about the response format.

[usama-openai]

Closing the PR due to inactivity; please feel free to reopen if you get a chance to address comments.