Do we need event/logs approver team?

[lmolkova]

trafficstars

We don't have a group that would:

• own/review/approve general logs and events definitions
  • https://github.com/open-telemetry/semantic-conventions/blob/main/docs/general/logs.md
  • https://github.com/open-telemetry/semantic-conventions/blob/main/docs/general/events.md
• triage issues in area:event and area:log

[lmolkova]

Discussed at SemComv WG call on 6/24:

• events WG focuses on Event spec stability & tooling work to define events
• event group does not work on logs or specific event definitions
• we still have general events conventions that this group should be codeowners (triagers/reviewers) for

/cc @MSNev @tedsuo @trask could you please request a group for event owners and add it to https://github.com/open-telemetry/semantic-conventions/blob/b1ad9ae785c3d97cf0c80fe320d9b9156f37e927/.github/CODEOWNERS#L26 ?

[trask]

requested: https://github.com/open-telemetry/community/issues/2199

[trask]

this is done now

[trask]

re-opening, still need to update CODEOWNERS file

[trask]

Also I realized there's a separate question about logs ownership, so leaving this open

[lmolkova]

Based on discussions in Logs SIG. Since we merged events and logs into Logs SIG, let's

• rename open-telemetry/semconv-event-approvers to open-telemetry/semconv-logs-approvers
• make them codeowners on event and log namespaces in the conventions along with general events and logs docs

/cc @open-telemetry/semconv-event-approvers