Enable `gocritic` in missing components
- [ ] #12327
- [x] #11437
- [x] #10582
- [x] #10590
- [ ] Enable gocritic in exporter/datadogexporter
- [x] #10595
- [x] #10850
- [x] #10855
- [x] #10884
- [x] #10905
- [x] #11164
- [x] #10909
- [ ] Enable gocritic in exporter/prometheusexporter
- [ ] Enable gocritic in exporter/prometheusremotewriteexporter
- [x] #10923
- [ ] Enable gocritic in exporter/signalfxexporter/internal/translation
- [x] #11162
- [ ] Enable gocritic in exporter/splunkhecexporter
- [x] #11159
- [x] #11161
- [x] #11026
- [x] #11066
- [x] #11529
- [ ] Enable gocritic in internal/aws/containerinsight
- [x] #12328
- [ ] Enable gocritic in internal/aws/k8s/k8sclient
- [ ] Enable gocritic in internal/aws/proxy
- [x] #11156
- [ ] Enable gocritic in internal/coreinternal/processor/filtermatcher
- [ ] Enable gocritic in pkg/stanza/adapter
- [x] #11552
- [ ] Enable gocritic in processor/k8sattributesprocessor
- [ ] Enable gocritic in processor/metricstransformprocessor
- [ ] Enable gocritic in processor/resourcedetectionprocessor/internal/aws/eks
- [ ] Enable gocritic in processor/routingprocessor
- [ ] Enable gocritic in processor/spanmetricsprocessor
- [x] #11778
- [ ] Enable gocritic in processor/tailsamplingprocessor
- [ ] Enable gocritic in processor/transformprocessor/internal/logs
- [ ] Enable gocritic in processor/transformprocessor/internal/metrics
- [ ] Enable gocritic in processor/transformprocessor/internal/traces
- [ ] #12325
- [ ] Enable gocritic in receiver/awsecscontainermetricsreceiver/internal/awsecscontainermetrics
- [ ] Enable gocritic in receiver/awsxrayreceiver/internal/translator
- [x] #11793
- [x] #11421
- [x] #11794
- [ ] Enable gocritic in receiver/dotnetdiagnosticsreceiver/metrics
- [ ] Enable gocritic in receiver/dotnetdiagnosticsreceiver/network
- [ ] Enable gocritic in receiver/googlecloudpubsubreceiver
- [x] #12499
- [ ] Enable gocritic in receiver/googlecloudspannerreceiver/internal/statsreader
- [ ] Enable gocritic in receiver/hostmetricsreceiver/internal/scraper/cpuscraper
- [ ] Enable gocritic in receiver/hostmetricsreceiver/internal/scraper/loadscraper
- [ ] Enable gocritic in receiver/jmxreceiver/internal/subprocess
- [x] #12214
- [x] #11798
- [x] #11799
- [x] #11806
- [x] #11802
- [x] #11804
- [ ] Enable gocritic in receiver/signalfxreceiver
- [ ] Enable gocritic in receiver/skywalkingreceiver
- [ ] Enable gocritic in receiver/splunkhecreceiver
- [ ] Enable gocritic in receiver/statsdreceiver/protocol
- [ ] Enable gocritic in receiver/statsdreceiver/transport
- [x] #11556
- [ ] Enable gocritic in testbed/datareceivers
- [x] #11464
List generated by running:
❯ git diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-only -r 0c691295193854523240b609c0c3cc06f9202b41 | rg .go$ | xargs dirname | sort | uniq | awk '{print "- [ ] Enable gocritic in " $0}'
@mx-psi please assign this to me :)
@mx-psi I have checked all component, for gocritic only two components are still not resolved, others can all be checked
- [x] exporter/datadogexporter: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/pull/12988
- [x] receiver/awscontainerinsightreceiver: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/pull/12325
Nice! Looks like pkg/telemetryquerylanguage/contexts/tqlmetrics/metrics.go is also missing, otherwise we are almost finished :)
@mx-psi Can this issue be closed?
❯ rg -tgo gocritic -l | cut -d '/' -f 1-2 | sort | uniq
pkg/ottl
receiver/awscontainerinsightreceive
These are the two components missing:
- The first one has no PR. @TylerHelmuth can you have a look? (Related to
pkg/ottl) - The second one has an open PR (https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/pull/12325) waiting on a review from @Aneurysm9.
@mx-psi I'll take a look
❯ rg -tgo gocritic -l | cut -d '/' -f 1-2 | sort | uniq pkg/ottl receiver/awscontainerinsightreceiveThese are the two components missing:
- The first one has no PR. @TylerHelmuth can you have a look? (Related to
pkg/ottl)- The second one has an open PR ([receiver/awscontainerinsight] fix lint error for awscontainerinsightreceiver #12325) waiting on a review from @Aneurysm9.
I think this issue is ready to be closed. =D @mx-psi
Indeed :tada: :tada: Thanks for your hard work on this @fatsheep9146 !