[Doc] Review deepwiki Gatekeeper docs
Describe the solution you'd like [A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.]
Review https://deepwiki.com/open-policy-agent/gatekeeper to see if there's anything missing or incorrect that we can improve in Gatekeeper docs.
Anything else you would like to add: [Miscellaneous information that will assist in solving the issue.]
Environment:
- Gatekeeper version:
- Kubernetes version: (use
kubectl version):
Who owns these docs? just curious.
AI generated based on whats in the repo.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
not stale
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
@ritazh The docs look good, there are few places where it gets things wrong, but overall I liked that you can ask questions and it helps answer them as best as it could. do we want to link this to out docs?
deepwiki docs has different take on how it generated the docs overall vs what we do. For example, we focus on explaining each feature while deepwiki docs divides the docs in "user doc/dev doc/configurations/overview" etc. I noticed that it didnt have any information that were missing from our docs necessarily, however deepwiki docs were missing some information (or at least it was not intuitive to find it.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.