Keith Oleson

I think the one remaining problem now is the negative 2-m humidity. I can solve that by limiting zeta in stable conditions, but not sure if we really want to...

You had also asked me to check the expression for z0mg when snomelt_accum = 0. I think your formulation is correct.

I'm on PTO Wed-Mon. But we had a preliminary meeting on this last week with myself, Erik, Sean, and Gordon (see #1596 ). So you could probably continue the discussion...

We asked Cecile to run a short fully coupled simulation similar to one of the CESM3-dev simulations (b.cesm3_cam058_mom_c.B1850WscMOM.f09_L58_t061.011) to see what the effects are of taking the negative runoff directly...

There are BUDGET WARNINGs in the mosart log file. For tracer 1 which I assume is liquid water. /glade/scratch/hannay/archive/b.cesm3_cam058_mom_c.B1850WscMOM.f09_L58_t061.015/logs/rof.log.5167742.chadmin1.ib0.cheyenne.ucar.edu.220726-082955.gz

Sean has fixed a couple of bugs in the MOSART code with respect to the BUDGET WARNINGs we encountered when we set bypass_routing_option='direct_to_outlet' and qgwl_runoff_option='negative' in the mosart namelist. I...

Yes, that is my understanding as well, thanks.

Yes, definitely should understand that. Another thing is that in the land-only simulations, global negative runoff was reduced by about 70% (from -7.2e6 m3/s to -2.2e6 m3/s), but I don't...

Ok, I think this is fine actually. We would expect the global sum of TOTAL_DISCHARGE_TO_OCEAN_LIQ to be conserved. I'm running a 'negative' option simulation anyway.

I don't see any significant differences with the 'negative' option combined with 'direct_in_place'.