Olof Kindgren

Yes and no. There is ongoing work to make SERV support several widths but it's not complete yet. There are a couple of more files that need to be fixed....

Thank you for this. Generally it looks fine, but there are also some changes in tests/edalize_common.py that I don't see mentioned anywhere (and a removed line in the docs). More...

It might very well be broken. I recently fixed pre_build scripts not being run properly (e438f9fc874db2b937c76f) but I haven't had time to check the run scripts. If you have a...

I didn't see any obvious issues in the code. Tried building it here and didn't see any issues in the logs either. I don't have the board so can't test...

Thank you for the new port. First of all, what is the PLL error you are seeing? I didn't see anything when I ran it myself. Anyway, the code looks...

I have looked at this before. It's possible to solve but it's a bit tricky. Can you work around it by just setting the define to 1 or something similar?...

I would prefer we port the xcelium backend to the new flow API instead. That way we will also get cocotb integration basically for free, as we have with the...

The patch looks fine and all. I'm a bit reluctant however to add more features to the backends that implement the old tool API rather than the new flow API....

A more severe issue is that it doesn't seem to pass CI tests, neither the formatting check or the actual tests. That needs to be fixed first.

Fixed tests and formatting and pushed through 4a7afda3da9911958d25a0a77a9e3ec4e8619c29