Olle Sandberg
Olle Sandberg
> I think signing the header contents totally (including the checksum) and then putting the signature after the checksum should suffice? If I'm reading this correctly, the "chunk data offset"...
Hi @max-sistemich-kisters , > 1.... Could you tell me whether there was a specific reason to not implement this? Probably my reasoning to close #3 was that I realized that...
Yes, this is because the dictionary is located first in the archive and the exact size of it is unknown before scanning and compressing the source. While the dictionary is...
I remember considering that initially but for some reason I decided not to. Right now I can't remember why. I guess it would be doable but it would obviously not...
I've been thinking a bit more about this and how it does seem like a pretty good idea to have the dictionary in the end of the archive. As already...
I think the header would be of static size with magic, offset and size of the dictionary/container. This space will be reserved first, then after all chunks and dictionary has...
And just to clarify, when I say header I mean the header located as the first thing in the archive.
No container expert here. What's missing to achieve what you want?
Not sure what you're after but running bita inside a container should be no different than running it on a host. And using bita to transfer container images (if the...
Yeah, that's what bita does - Delta update of a file from one version to another. It doesn't care what kind of file it is, container image or what else,...