oliver munz

Results 71 comments of oliver munz

i think the `pre_osdi ./psp103_nqs.osdi` belongs to the `https://gitlab.com/dmt-development/ihp_sg13g2_compact_models`

You would prefer `./simulation/.spiceinit` then?

the ng-parameter makes the same W via many smaller W/ng. if i make an 10u/1u ng=5 FET, then it produces a fet with 5 fingers and about W=10u (per FET...

![ng 1 and 2](https://github.com/IHP-GmbH/IHP-Open-PDK/assets/120017377/cb647f5e-ee75-405b-900c-9c69cce63ac3)

`Nsg13_lv_nmos d g s b sg13g2_lv_nmos_psp w='w/ng' l=l mult=ng` mult is already used inside the model. its not accessible from spice, maybe i can change the model to `Nsg13_lv_nmos d...

if i understand the `m` and `mult` parameter correct, its about to be able to use some parts in parallel, without the need of drawing all this parts and wire...

the idea with changing the netlist would work: i could use TCL in Xschem to generate `m` times the same MOSFET in the spice-netlist. but then the sad ngspice has...

if i change all the models to `Nsg13_lv_nmos d g s b sg13g2_lv_nmos_psp w='w/ng' l=l mult='m*ng'` **mult='m*ng'** instead of **mult=ng**, then m does what i would expect: ![multi](https://github.com/IHP-GmbH/IHP-Open-PDK/assets/120017377/95edf456-5bbc-428d-b45f-31ccdcdf9066)

im not sure: `m` or `multi` should do this multiplications inside the model. but i will try some ac-simulations also and see what comes out of the simulation if i...

the strange kink was from a floating bulk. now it looks better (left lv_nmos right hv_nmos) ![bulk](https://github.com/IHP-GmbH/IHP-Open-PDK/assets/120017377/bf083398-47d6-449f-acab-9872c71f2f8b)