Oleksandr Leushchenko
Oleksandr Leushchenko
Thanks for the proposed changes. Would you please describe in a bit more details why you believe `Future` would be a better choice?
> 99 percent of use cases for hooks I could think of require you to await something. That's an interesting observation. I'd say all initializations and/or preparations in my **widget**...
Hello @Oct7, Thanks again for your contribution! I've made a few changes to your PR. You may expect a new version on pub.dev soon.
I’m working in a mono-repo with more than 300 packages, so I’m very curious about this proposal. I’m unsure if I fully understand it, so I prepared some questions/comments: 1....
The framework was created and optimized for widget tests, so the assumption was that if you have integration tests then you probably have unit/widget tests as well and you want...
I thought a lot about your proposition. I'm not sure whether it's a good idea to provide too much flexibility to package users as they may do completely wrong stuff....
Ah, right, apologies. Please try now.
Hello, @AntoniKwok. Did you have a chance to try the modified plugin?