Oleksij Rempel
Oleksij Rempel
Hi Arnold, 1. If I understood correctly, your hardware setup can be represented as follows: ``` |----------------| CAN bus 500kbps |----------------| UDP over |------VPN------| UDP over |----------------| CAN bus |----------------|...
Hello Arnold, Thanks for explaining your situation. Based on what we've talked about, I see the possible problem is in the timing of CAN messages when you convert them to...
To avoid inventing new protocols, ISOBUS specification defines ISOBUS file system protocol ISO 11783 - 13. I'm working on implementation of client and server part, here: https://github.com/olerem/can-utils/tree/isobusfs-2023.05.15 Since it is...
@KendallMIT the kernel support for j1939 is not upstream. you will need to use this branch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkl/linux-can-next.git/log/?h=j1939
No. No one who is using SocketCAN will take a time travel in to begging of 2000 to experience this pain again.
json variable is lest. Will send new version soon.
Hi @bmah888, can you please give me some feedback for this PR :)
Hi @mihai-demian, > First of all, please allow me to thank you for the great work are doing. I am trying to emulate a truck, meaning that I want to...
See https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.4-rc7/networking/j1939.html
Can you please tell more about what you wont to make? Are you trying to implement TCP/UDP to J1939 bridge?